Georgia Tech's GC Office Maintains Lead in Food Frenzy
Teams are fighting for every single dollar, which food banks can turn into four meals.
April 21, 2020 at 04:42 PM
2 minute read
Momentum from Monday's blockbuster start to the Georgia Legal Food Frenzy continued Tuesday.
After scoring $119,000 by mid-afternoon Monday, as of 3:30 p.m. Tuesday, the statewide total stood at $175,529 for Georgia's food banks, which are dealing with unprecedented demand in the wake of job losses caused by coronavirus social distancing efforts. Last year's event raised $419,000 when, even before the pandemic, about 16% of Georgians didn't know how they'd obtain their next meal.
Food banks have reported that, in recent weeks, they have had to increase food distribution by up to 40%. In addition to high demand, food banks have lost some funding sources. The Atlanta Community Food Bank, for example, had to cancel its annual Hunger Walk/Run, which in 2018 raised more than $1 million.
Data from the Food Frenzy's dashboard showed that 1,416 individual donors had given to the cause, averaging about $124 per donation. Attorney General Chris Carr, one of the event sponsors, has urged lawyers to donate the cost of one billable hour.
As it has in previous years, Georgia Tech Office of the General Counsel continued to hold a sizable lead in the overall cash race with $18,911.50. But firms have often been able to close the gap and overtake the Yellow Jackets by the end of the event, which this year closes on Friday, May 1.
The teams immediately behind Tech are: Squire Patton Boggs, with $6,246.25; the Office of the Attorney General, $5,476; King & Spalding, $5,473, Troutman Sanders, $5,292.75; and Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs, $5,152.50.
Habachy Law, which is a five-time winner of the per capita donation award, had raised $4,625, followed by Alston & Bird, $4,512.25; BakerHostetler, $4,426.25; and The Cochran Firm; $4,399.25.
"The totals today demonstrate that the competition is off to a strong start, but we need to continue to work hard to increase those numbers," Carr said Tuesday. "And if we do, more shelves will be stocked at our food banks, more deliveries will be made and more Georgians in need will be served."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readFormer United Natural Foods GM Sues for Reverse Racism Claims, Wrongful Termination Over Firing Decision
Slideshow: Legal Food Frenzy Awards Presentation Held at Bar Offices
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250