High Court Reconsiders Conviction in Quarter-Century-Old Murder Case
"There is nothing in the world that would justify putting a gun to a person's head and pulling the trigger," District Attorney Bill Doupe told the Georgia Supreme Court.
April 23, 2020 at 09:21 AM
4 minute read
With a grim set of facts and a hard way to go, Konrad Gerhard Walde Ziegler of Lee & Ziegler is asking the Georgia Supreme Court to overturn for a second time the murder conviction of Melissa Norris on charges of killing her father in 1995 while he sat on his sofa.
"It's only a very narrow issue," Ziegler told the Daily Report before his Tuesday video teleconference oral argument before a high court closed by the novel coronavirus pandemic. He said Norris had an excellent defense for her second trial in 2017 with Rodney Zell of Zell & Zell after Zell won the reversal of her first conviction from 1997. Ziegler said District Attorney Bill Doupe also did an excellent job, and it was a clean trial before McDuffie County Superior Court Judge Thomas Britt Hammond of the Toombs Judicial Circuit.
But when the Georgia Public Defender Council asked Ziegler to handle the new appeal, he found one possible mistake. He told the high court the judge failed to charge the jury on mistake of fact—a common law concept that could negate guilt if a person was operating under a mistaken belief.
"What is the mistake of fact?" Justice Keith Blackwell asked during Tuesday's argument, almost immediately.
The mistake of fact in this case, Ziegler answered, was that Norris said she didn't know the gun was loaded.
"Even if she didn't know the gun was loaded, how is it justified to put a gun to her father's head and pull the trigger?" Blackwell asked.
That question kept coming up. Ziegler's response was that it should have been a question for the jury.
Even if Ziegler wins, the best he can hope for is a new trial. And two juries have already found Norris guilty of murder—a fact the DA was quick to point out when it was his time to argue. His predecessor and former boss, longtime DA Dennis Sanders, prosecuted the case the first time, although Doupe remembered it well. Doupe prosecuted it himself 20 years later. Doupe was able to tell the justices that\—through the magic of Zoom teleconferencing—he was making his argument standing "in the very same courtroom."
As Doupe also pointed out, Norris gave completely different testimony the second time around. In the first trial, she said it was her older brother who killed her father, not she. In the second trial, she said she did it but that she was only playing with her brother's gun and didn't know it was loaded.
But Doupe said the killing did not look accidental to him. He said the gun was pressed so close against the skin that it left a contact wound with the imprint of a muzzle.
Doupe's recall of the details was stunning. Soon Chief Justice Harold Melton, who wrote the opinion reversing the first conviction, directed the DA to focus on the narrow issue of the appeal—whether Norris knew the gun was loaded.
Doupe argued that she never even checked.
"The evidence was overwhelming that she executed her father," Doupe said. "There is nothing in the world that would justify putting a gun to a person's head and pulling the trigger."
Whatever the justices decide this time, the appeal is about more than a possible mistake on a legal concept. It's about a now-40-year-old woman who has lived most of her life at the Lee Arrendale State Prison in the Appalachian foothills of Habersham County. Her sentence was life plus five years both times. She has been behind bars since she was 15.
In response to an inquiry, a spokesman for the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole said Thursday Norris has been moved to Pulaski State Prison in Hawkinsville. She is up for parole in May. But she has already been considered and denied five times.
"It was just a stupid kid playing with a stupid gun that was in the house without the parents' permission," said Zell, the defense attorney who won the reversal of the first conviction on the grounds that the judge failed to instruct the jury on a lesser charge of manslaughter. "How much time does a 15-year-old girl deserve?"
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250