Food Frenzy Goals Point to More Work in Final Week
Food banks can turn a $10 donation into $80 worth of food.
April 24, 2020 at 04:49 PM
2 minute read
The Georgia Legal Food Frenzy rode into the weekend having raised $312,018, as of 4 p.m. Friday, for the state's besieged food banks.
It's an impressive figure, given last year's event raised $419,000 over the 12 days of competition. But the needs of food banks have grown exponentially in the past month, as about one million Georgians have lost jobs due to efforts to slow COVID-19. Before the pandemic, food banks were already serving 1.5 million Georgians who didn't know how they'd get their next meal.
The top 10 teams overall were:
- Georgia Tech Office of the General Counsel, $19,141.50;
- Habachy Law, the defending champion, $11,156;
- Alston & Bird, $10,392.90;
- Troutman Sanders $9,649.60;
- Office of the Attorney General, $7,973.75;
- Johnson & Ward, $7,750;
- Squire Patton Boggs, $7,541.05;
- Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs, $7,432.25;
- Arnall Golden Gregory, $7,297.50; and
- BakerHostetler, $7,127.50.
But changes are inevitable next week, as several firms and other teams have significant funds to raise to meet their goals before the event ends on May 1.
Teams to watch include current second-place holder Habachy Law, which is shooting for another $18,900 to reach a $30,000 goal; Troutman Sanders, which is a little more than halfway to its $18,000 goal; Johnson & Ward, which needs another $4,250 to reach its $12,000 goal; and King & Spalding, currently in 12th place with $6,854, about $13,000 from its $20,000 goal.
There are 199 teams participating.
Here are the teams ranked 11th through 20th, according to the Frenzy's website:
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton- Atlanta Office, $6,927;
- King & Spalding, $6,854;
- DLA Piper, $6,523;
- Imerys, $6,364;
- Lueder Larkin & Hunter, $5,739;
- Supreme Court of Georgia and Georgia Court of Appeals, $5,607;
- Serta Simmons Bedding, $5,365;
- The Cochran Firm Atlanta, $5,124;
- Taylor English Duma, $5,027; and
- McGuireWoods, $4,813.
Here are teams ranked 21st through 30th:
- McGuireWoods, $4,813;
- Hunton Andrews Kurth, $4,607;
- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, $4,421;
- Atlanta Legal Aid Society, $3,720;
- Fulton Superior Court, $3,594;
- Miles Mediation & Arbitration, $3,521;
- Weltner Family Law Inn of Court, $3,434;
- AT&T/WarnerMedia, $3,338;
- Jenkins & Roberts, $3,065; and
- The Foodies at Krevolin Horst, $3,013.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBojangles Restaurant Chain Faces Several Lawsuits Following Data Breach
Stuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250