Judge Rejects Reality Winner's Petition for Release From Prison Due to COVID-19
Judge Randal Hall noted that, even if he did have authority to commute her sentence, he wouldn't do so.
April 24, 2020 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge has rejected a motion to commute Reality Winner's sentence to home confinement despite the presence of COVID-19 at the federal prison where she is housed.
In a Friday order, District Chief Judge Randal Hall, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, said he agreed with federal prosecutors that Winner has not exhausted her administrative remedies through the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. Hall also held that the bureau, not the judiciary, has the sole authority to grant Winner "compassionate release."
Hall noted that, even if he did have authority to commute her sentence because of extraordinary circumstances associated with the spread of COVID-19 and her prior medical conditions, he wouldn't do so.
"Winner is in a medical prison, which is presumably better equipped than most to deal with the onset of COVID-19 in its inmates," he said.
A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Bobby Christine declined to comment.
Winner counsel Joe Whitley, a partner at the Atlanta offices of Baker Donelson, said his team was disappointed by Hall's ruling.
"Our motion for compassionate release provided the court with, in our view, the correct, constitutional legal pathway for Judge Hall—commensurate with similar favorable district court decisions across the country—to permit Reality to serve the remainder of her sentence in home confinement. … We can only hope that the court's decision does not result in Reality being exposed to this deadly virus," Whitley said.
Winner was the first person prosecuted by the Trump administration for leaking information to the media.
Hall said Winner asked him to commute the remaining 19 months of her 63-month sentence just two days after she submitted a written request for compassionate release to the warden at FMC Carswell in Fort Worth, Texas, where she is incarcerated.
"The BOP essentially must be given at least 30 days to consider any request for compassionate release," Hall said. "This waiting period is appropriate because the BOP is better positioned to assess an individual inmate's present circumstances."
The judge also concluded that, "In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where the BOP has implemented policies and proactive measures to protect the health and safety of its prisons' populations … the expertise and informed assessment of the BOP should not be heedlessly omitted from the process."
In court papers filed Wednesday, Whitley called the federal prison system's claims that it has taken precautionary measures to stem the spread of COVID-19, "demonstrably inaccurate."
On Friday, the Bureau of Prisons reported that 620 inmates and 357 staff members in the nation's federal prisons have tested positive for COVID-19—an increase of 80 inmates and 34 staff from three days ago. Two-dozen inmates have died, according to the Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 national organizations.
FMC-Carswell has reported that only two inmates are infected, a number that has remained unchanged for nearly two weeks as the virus has spread through a nearby federal prison. News reports have said six Carswell guards had symptoms and 31 inmates have been quarantined.
Hall also took issue in his order with findings by other district courts across the nation that have labeled as "outdated" a federal policy giving the director of the Bureau of Prisons sole authority to approve an inmate's compassionate release petition for "extraordinary and compelling" reasons.
Hall said those decisions by other courts "rest upon a faulty premise" that the federal law expanding an inmate's ability to seek compassionate release rendered earlier release policies established by the U.S. Sentencing Commission inappropriate.
Hall insisted that the Sentencing Commission, not the judiciary, "must determine what constitutes an appropriate use of the "compassionate release" provision.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250