Ex-Wife Hit With $120K Legal Bill After Divorce From Jailed Contractor ER Mitchell
Attorney Esther Panitch initially sued her former client, Marjorie Mitchell, for more than $190,000 in unpaid legal fees stemming from her divorce.
April 28, 2020 at 02:42 PM
4 minute read
The ex-wife of imprisoned Atlanta city contractor Elvin "E.R." Mitchell is on the hook for $120,000 in legal fees owed to the attorney who handled her divorce, according to a recent court filing.
Panitch Law Group principal Esther Panitch, who represented Marjorie Mitchell in the divorce and served as her spokeswoman until withdrawing from the case in 2018, sued her former client in Fulton County State Court last year seeking more than $190,000 in fees.
At the time, Panitch said said she had already been paid more than $73,500 for her services, billing Mitchell at an hourly rate of $337.50 for attorney services and $150 for paralegal work, plus expenses.
According to an application to confirm the State Bar of Georgia arbitration award filed with the court last week, Mitchell disputed the amount of fees she owed to Panitch following the couple's 2018 divorce. Mitchell filed legal malpractice counterclaims against her former lawyer, which she subsequently dropped.
Mitchell suggested they take the dispute to arbitration at the state Bar, Panitch said, "and I thought that was a good idea."
Panitch said she has already recouped some of the additional funds she sought outside of the arbitration.
The attorney who represented Mitchell at the bar arbitration, Blitch Law principal James Blitch IV, declined to publicly discuss the case. Mitchell declined to comment.
The three-member arbitration panel—John Sparks Sr., Howard Simmons and Gloria Smiley—said in their Jan. 24 ruling that a written, hourly fee contract existed between the parties and awarded $120,051 "in addition to all sums previously paid by the petitioner to the respondent."
According to the application seeking to confirm the award, Mitchell has said she will not pay the fees voluntarily and has refused to let her attorney accept service, requiring Panitch to hire a private process server to deliver the judgment.
Panitch said that, because of the COVID-19 outbreak, she has had difficulty serving Mitchell. She also said Mitchell has the means to pay the judgment.
"If she weren't good for it, I wouldn't waste my time," she said.
Panitch's petition asks Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox Jr. to schedule a hearing on the matter and award the arbitration award plus any additional fees and expenses Panitch incurs attempting to collect it.
The Mitchells were married for 28 years when Marjorie Mitchell filed for divorce after her husband pleaded guilty for his role after he was caught up in a federal investigation into corruption in awarding contracts by the city of Atlanta.
Their marriage ended in 2018 after a four-day divorce trial, which Panitch handled.
E.R. Mitchell pleaded guilty to paying more than $1 million in bribes to obtain city contracts. Another contractor, Charles Richards Jr. and the city's former purchasing officer, Adam Smith, also pleaded guilty in the federal investigation.
According to her divorce suit, Mitchell's husband mortgaged two homes belonging to the couple and raided their children's trust funds prior to his indictment on bribery charges.
A co-defendant of E.R. Mitchell in the bribery cases, political consultant the Rev. Mitzi Bickers, also was named in the divorce action as someone who might hold interests that Marjorie Mitchell would have a claim to. Bickers was slated to stand trial this month, but that has been continued until June due to the pandemic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
5 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Legal Aid and Tech Collaboration Can Bridge the Justice Gap
- 2The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 3Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 4Spoliation Sanctions
- 5At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250