Legal Community Closes in on Last Year's Total, but 2020 Is Different
The unprecedented haul illustrates the unprecedented needs of the food banks, which have reported distributing 40% more food than usual as the COVID-19 pandemic has forced more than one million Georgians out of work.
April 28, 2020 at 04:42 PM
2 minute read
The Georgia legal community had raised $413,132 for the state's food banks as of 4 p.m. Tuesday—nearly matching last year's total more than three days before the Legal Food Frenzy closes.
The unprecedented haul illustrates the unprecedented needs of the food banks, which have reported distributing 40% more food than usual as the COVID-19 pandemic has forced more than one million Georgians out of work. Even before the pandemic, food banks estimated 1.5 million people in the state didn't have enough to eat.
Many of the 214 teams in the statewide competition are blowing past their goals to help keep the food banks stocked, and the top-raising firms are taking positions that should make these final days interesting.
The Georgia Tech Office of the General Counsel remains in the overall lead, with $20,045, but five-time winner Habachy Law jumped $7,000, to $19,002, in one day to close the gap with the Yellow Jackets.
Alston & Bird rose to $14,385, while Troutman Sanders placed fourth at $11,646.
Several other big firms are bunched behind, led by King & Spalding, at $11,623, which added $4,000 in one day; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton's Atlanta office, at $10,687, and Arnall Golden Gregory, at $9,372.50.
The Office of the Attorney General was in eighth place, at $8,922.75, followed by Taylor English Duma, at $8,550.50, and BakerHostetler at $8,530.
Food banks say they can make efficient use of donations, so a $10 donation can equal 40 meals.
To find teams or get more information, go to https://galegalfoodfrenzy.org/.
The event is sponsored by the Office of the Attorney General, the Young Lawyers Division of the State Bar of Georgia and the Georgia Food Bank Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readFormer United Natural Foods GM Sues for Reverse Racism Claims, Wrongful Termination Over Firing Decision
Slideshow: Legal Food Frenzy Awards Presentation Held at Bar Offices
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250