Blowing Through Goalposts, Food Fundraiser Tests 'What Was Thought Possible'
"It's a reminder that people everywhere are good and kind," said the current leader of the event.
April 30, 2020 at 05:18 PM
2 minute read
The Georgia legal community had raised $544,668 for the state's food banks as of 4 p.m. Thursday—$125,000 more than the total Legal Food Frenzy raised last year.
"The legal community is pushing the boundaries of what was thought possible," the Atlanta Community Food Bank said on its Frenzy website.
"Georgia's food banks are humbled by the outpouring of support we have seen from Georgia's legal community," said Callie Roan of the Georgia Food Bank Association, one of the Frenzy co-sponsors.
The legal community has until 11:59 p.m. Friday to pad its numbers, which already will provide more than two million meals. Even before the pandemic forced more than one million people to lose their jobs lost in Georgia, food banks estimated there were 1.5 million Georgians who did not know how they'd get their next meal.
The Georgia legal community has responded to these needs with intense fundraising.
Habachy Law maintained its lead, standing at $35,317. The Georgia Tech Office of the General Counsel clung to second place, at $20,179, as Alston & Bird rode a huge wave to $20,171.
The rest of the top 10 firms included Arnall Golden Gregory, at $13,666; King & Spalding, $12,286; Troutman Sanders, $11,851; Kilpatrick Townsend-Atlanta Office, $10,713; Johnson & Ward, $10,638; the Office of the Attorney General, at $10,473; and BakerHostetler, at $10,210.
Joe Habachy of Habachy Law noted a $10,000 donation that came Wednesday left him speechless: "It came from a friend who has been generous in the past but took it to a new level this year."
He added he's most moved by random donors that surface each year, such as an auto parts supplier, a woman he sat next to on a short flight, several "prospective" clients who chose other attorneys, the owner of a vacation rental he used "and on and on."
"It's a reminder that people everywhere are good and kind."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readFormer United Natural Foods GM Sues for Reverse Racism Claims, Wrongful Termination Over Firing Decision
Slideshow: Legal Food Frenzy Awards Presentation Held at Bar Offices
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250