SEC Claims Company, Atlanta CEO Made False Promises About N95 Mask Supply
Company's lawyer responds that the SEC staff is peddling a "false narrative."
April 30, 2020 at 12:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
A publicly traded South Florida company is accused of trying to capitalize on the COVID-19 pandemic with false promises of a huge N95 mask supply line and setting the minimum order at 100,000 masks.
West Palm Beach-based Praxsyn Corp. issued misleading mask promotions dating back to at least Feb. 27 when the virus was mostly an Asian phenomenon and the United States had 15 cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Tuesday.
The company's microcap shares traded over the counter at 80 times the pre-coronavirus volume after promoting its high-volume mask supply line, the SEC civil complaint said. The agency temporarily suspended trading in the stock March 26, citing "blatantly false" Feb. 27 and March 4 news releases.
The company initially said it was "evaluating multiple orders and vetting various suppliers in order to guarantee a supply chain that can deliver millions of masks on a timely schedule" and followed up by saying it had a "direct pipeline from manufacturers and suppliers to buyers."
"Praxsyn never had either a single order from any buyer to purchase masks, or a single contract with any manufacturer or supplier to obtain masks, let alone any masks actually in its possession," the SEC complaint said. After regulatory inquiries, the company admitted in a March 31 release that it never had any masks.
The civil complaint charged the company traded as PXYN and CEO Frank Brady, 45, of Atlanta, with three counts of securities violations. Company securities are not registered with the SEC.
They are represented by Stanley Morris of Corrigan & Morris in West Los Angeles. The former senior SEC enforcement attorney had no comment when contacted Thursday but forwarded his April 20 response to an SEC investigation notice, which he said "appears to be a rush to judgment."
"Notwithstanding the staff's desperate attempt to create a false narrative that Praxsyn was exploiting the virus crisis to pump and dump its stock, there is no hint that anyone affiliated with Praxsyn made a penny trading securities," he wrote. "There is no dissipation of assets. This is not a cut and run scenario."
The SEC can show no intent to deceive, Morris said. His clients "are sympathetic to the public outcry" about coronavirus fraud and acted "reasonably, objectively, and subjectively in light of the circumstances." The March 31 release amounted to a retraction and the company "announced it would no longer pursue the protective mask business."
Paxsyn's spare homepage said the company is "empowering healthcare" and offers links to five financial statements. Its latest report listed 742 million shares of common stock, $81,378 in unaudited net revenue and $11.1 million in assets at the end of 2018.
Not even a penny stock, Praxsyn's share price ranged from $0.0048 and $0.009 a share in the three months before its first suspicious new release and climbed to a range of $0.0095 to $0.0188 on Feb. 27, the SEC said. Average daily trading value zoomed up from 384,165 shares to 30.8 million shares on the strength of the company announcements.
Florida corporate records filed April 20 list a company office in a coworking suite in one of West Palm Beach's top office buildings, Phillips Point West Tower on the water overlooking ritzy Palm Beach. The SEC complaint said Praxsyn is a Nevada corporation, and attachments to the Florida filing list Nevada records for the company dating back to 2015.
The company offers itself as a finance company that offers medical receivables financing to providers focused on personal injury and workers' compensation cases, the SEC said.
Morris said its Praxsyn Medical Inc. subsidiary is a wholesale medical supply business. The company relied on expert brokers but was "whipsawed by the volatile and evolving market."
Law enforcement agencies have been warning consumers to watch out for coronavirus scams since the pandemic was declared.
The company and its CEO "sought to exploit unsuspecting investors by issuing false and misleading press releases concerning Praxsyn's ability to source and supply N95 masks for the COVID-19 virus," SEC regional director Eric I. Bustillo in Miami said in a news release.
Steven Peikin, co-director of the SEC's enforcement division, said in a statement, "We will move swiftly against those who seek to profit off this national emergency by cheating or misleading investors."
The investigation was conducted by the SEC's Microcap Fraud Task Force. The case was filed by SEC senior trial counsel Robert Levenson, who filed notices that both defendants waived service.
The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz in Fort Lauderdale, and answers to the SEC complaint are due June 29.
Read the complaint:
Read more:
PPE Prosecutions on Rise in Brooklyn Federal Court as California Attorney Is Charged Under Defense Production Act
Brooklyn Prosecutors Say 2 Men Demanded $4 Million for Masks in Coronavirus-Related Fraud Scheme
Feds Crack Down on Hoarding of Scarce Materials and Price Gouging Due to COVID-19
Department of Justice, States, SEC Pursue COVID-19 Enforcement Actions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250