Atlanta Lawyers Eye Trials of COVID-19 Drug After 'Mad Scramble' for IP Deal
A typical intellectual property transaction licensing a drug to a producer might take four to six months. The deal for Emory University's potential treatment for COVID-19 took two weeks.
May 07, 2020 at 04:29 PM
5 minute read
Fritts, a veteran of intellectual property work at big law firms, oversees patent and license strategy and all IP matters at Emory University's office commercializing inventions developed by Emory researchers. In March, just as she had to shift her workspace from the campus to her kitchen table, she was focused on a discovery called EIDD-2801.
The research behind EIDD-2801 started in 2014 under federal defense contracts for a treatment against potentially weaponized encephalitis, but it evolved into an agent that could stop a broad range of viruses from reproducing. When the novel coronavirus started killing people in China in January, Emory's nonprofit biotechnology company, Drug Innovation Ventures at Emory, or DRIVE, identified EIDD-2801 as a potential treatment.
DRIVE wanted to sell a license to a Miami company, Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, which received plaudits for its work on an Ebola drug in 2018. If the license could be completed, Ridgeback would test the drug and, if successful, produce it for a desperate world market.
"I didn't want our office holding up the deal," Fritts said.
Neither did anyone else. "It became a mad scramble," said David Perryman, an IP lawyer who is DRIVE's chief operating officer. He suggested that the intellectual property work for a transaction like the Ridgeback license would typically take four to six months, but it was accomplished in two weeks.
Perryman credited the quick deal to an executive-to-executive negotiating process that started in the middle, "not the extremes," and fast, focused work by Fritts and her colleagues at Emory's Office of Technology Transfer, Eversheds Sutherland IP partner Peter Quittmeyer and patent lawyer Christopher Curfman of Meunier Carlin & Curfman.
The terms of the transaction weren't disclosed, but Fritts said to move this quickly, "There had to be a good bit of trust" between the parties, starting with their supposed "last best offer."
Ridgeback was represented by Judith Hasko of Latham & Watkins in Menlo Park, California. Through a firm spokeswoman, Hasko declined to discuss the deal.
Quittmeyer, the outside counsel, said he is used to clients moving very fast, but "there was definitely an urgency to this." He estimated that the parties had 90% of their issues agreed upon when negotiations started.
Moreover, he recalled a similar matter that went through 27 drafts of its contract. The Emory-Ridgeback deal had fewer than 10.
"Everyone knew you were talking about, potentially, lives" at stake, Quittmeyer said.
He added that Emory's technology transfer team, which had to work on a host of federal and university requirements, "really turned it around in miraculous time."
Curfman's role was to support DRIVE's deal team with information about global patent strategy, such as how one could file for patents in different countries and how those processes can be expedited.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbortion Rights Set to Return to Supreme Court With Mifepristone Case
Why Northern District of Georgia Case Terminations Soared in 2022
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250