'No One Has Ever Before Made Such Allegations Against Me': Coomer Denies Fraud Charges
"I am disappointed that he has filed this action," Judge Chris Coomer said of the former client who is suing him, "but intend to defend myself vigorously against these allegations."
May 07, 2020 at 08:04 PM
5 minute read
Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Christian Coomer told the Daily Report on Thursday he performed solid legal work at a reasonable rate and paid back a loan with interest for a former client who is now suing him for fraud.
"In my 21 years as a lawyer, including four years on active duty in the Air Force, 16 years in the Air Force Reserve, 15 years in private practice, and my time in public service, no one has ever before made such allegations against me," Coomer said in an email. "I've filed an answer to the lawsuit denying all allegations of fraud and setting out my defenses to the allegations."
Allegations from that lawsuit have now led to investigations by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the Judicial Qualifications Commission.
GBI Director Vic Reynolds said Thursday that Cherokee Judicial Circuit District Attorney Rosemary Greene requested an investigation May 1 into allegations of fraud made against Coomer.
"The investigation is ongoing," Reynolds said in an emailed statement.
Also Thursday, Judicial Qualifications Commission Director Chuck Boring confirmed that the group, which polices judicial conduct, has an open investigation.
"That's all we can say," Boring said.
W. Wright Gammon Jr. of Gammon, McFall & Villarreal in Cedartown filed the lawsuit March 6 in Bartow County State Court on behalf of James Filhart, who is now 78. The complaint accuses Coomer of fraud and of breaching his fiduciary duty in his representation of Filhart on several matters when Coomer had a private law practice.
Coomer closed up his law office on West Main Street in Cartersville in October 2018 after his appointment to the bench by then-Gov. Nathan Deal. Coomer had served eight years as a state representative from Cartersville, most recently as Republican majority whip. He had previously been the governor's legislative floor leader.
The work that led to the lawsuit started with a guardianship for Filhart's "girlfriend"—who was in a nursing home—for a $20,000 retainer. Filhart paid an additional $60,000, for which he said he never received an accounting. He also said he made loans for $159,000 and $130,000 to a holding company Coomer controlled. And he said Coomer drafted a will making himself executor and a beneficiary, which Filhart alleged is a violation of rules of professional conduct.
"I performed substantial legal services for Mr. Filhart, and the value of the time I spent performing those services exceeds what he paid in legal fees," Coomer said Thursday. "I obtained a successful result for him in a difficult and contested probate proceeding. I continued to perform substantial legal work for him after that case concluded in 2016."
The two got to know each other beyond the legal work.
"He spent many hours visiting my staff in our office, and my family in our home, and we became close," Coomer continued. "In the course of our relationship and friendship, he indicated he had money tied up that was not earning much return and offered to loan me money as he had done for others. I took him up on the offer, and in compliance with my ethical obligations, Mr. Filhart gave written, informed consent pursuant to Georgia's Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.8(a), acknowledging that he should consult other counsel regarding these transactions. The installments on each of these loans was timely paid, and they've all been paid off and satisfied in full."
Coomer also responded to the allegations about the will.
"Mr. Filhart decided to make me the beneficiary of his Last Will and Testament. At the time, he was of sound mind, as witnessed by two of his friends who were present at the signing of these estate documents and a notary public who knew him. He has certainly been free to change the provisions of his Will, and I believe he did so some time ago," Coomer said.
"I believe that I did good legal work for him and that my charges were appropriate and known to him when he paid them," Coomer said. "He loaned me money at a reasonable rate; I have honored the terms of those loans; and I have paid them off in full, with interest. I believe he knew what he was doing when all of these transactions were executed. I am disappointed that he has filed this action, but intend to defend myself vigorously against these allegations."
Gammon confirmed Thursday that Coomer paid back all loans in full with interest—"after we filed the lawsuit."
But the complaint also seeks attorney fees and punitive damages. Asked what Filhart would like to have happen now, Gammon said, "He wants to be made whole."
Gammon, who has had success both as a plaintiffs lawyer and a criminal defense attorney, said he is hoping to reach a settlement.
When approached by "the powers that be" over the investigations, "I asked them to please hold off," he said.
"I'm just trying to get an old man his money."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250