Gwinnett Bar Poll Favors Incumbents in Three Contested Races
The Gwinnett Bar Association poll showed that all three incumbents were rated "well qualified" by the lawyers who participated in the survey.
May 08, 2020 at 09:55 AM
6 minute read
The Gwinnett County Bar Association released a members' poll showing strong support for two Superior Court judges and one State Court judge facing challengers in the June 9 elections.
The poll, released late last month, included responses from 343 members of GCBA, many of whom had remarks—some pointed, some of praise—for the candidates.
Association President Donald Lee said, given the fact that many voters will be casting their ballots by mail, he wanted to share the results as widely as possible.
"It's important to get that information out for non-lawyers, who probably don't know who these people are," Lee said.
|Superior Court Races
Incumbent Judge Randy Rich is facing challenger Tamela Adkins. Rich was appointed by then-Gov. Nathan Deal in 2014 and faced no opposition when he ran to keep the seat in 2016.
When Deal tapped him for the court, Rich was serving as State Court judge, to which he was elected in 2004.
Rich launched the Gwinnett County Business Court and serves as an accountability court judge, and according to his campaign website is an adjunct law professor and teaches continuing legal education courses on professionalism, ethics and evidence.
He is a graduate of the University of Georgia Law School and joined the State Bar of Georgia in 1992.
Adkins is a family law specialist based in Lawrenceville who, according to her website, has represented "thousands of men and women in courtrooms throughout Georgia and Florida."
Adkins is opposing Rich because, her site claims, he does not hear the majority of domestic cases assigned to him and instead relies on magistrate judges to handle that caseload.
Adkins is a graduate of the University of Bridgeport Law School and joined the bar in 1993.
The poll results:
Adkins: Well-qualified: 31 (9%); qualified: 64 (19%); not qualified: 103 (30%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 145 (42%).
Rich: Well-qualified: 235 (69%); qualified: 65 (19%); not qualified: 7 (2%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 36 (11%).
Judge Kathryn Schrader is facing four challengers: Deborah Fluker, Kelly Kautz, Christa Kirk and B. Thassanee "B.T." Parker.
A former family law attorney, Schrader also served as a municipal court judge for Duluth and Sugar Hill before being elected to the Superior Court bench in 2012. She was reelected in 2016.
Schrader is a graduate of Mercer University's Walter F. George School of Law and joined the State Bar of Georgia in 1976.
Schrader may seem like an easy target: She was indicted for computer trespass last year after hiring a private investigator to place a device on her court computer when she became concerned it had been hacked, but a mistrial was declared when the jury couldn't reach a decision in February.
Schrader was suspended from the bench by the Judicial Qualifications Council after her indictment. That suspension expired, but she remains voluntarily off the bench, pending possible retrial.
She was nonetheless the favorite among the Gwinnett lawyers responding to the poll.
Fluker has served as a judge in Gwinnett's Magistrate Court since 2016. She also has served as an associate municipal judge in Dacula and Suwanee. She began her legal career as an assistant prosecutor in the Northeastern, Stone Mountain and Gwinnett judicial circuits before launching a private practice, which she gave up when appointed as a magistrate judge.
Fluker is a graduate of the Georgia State University College of Law and joined the bar in 1997.
Kautz began her legal career as an assistant prosecutor in the Alcovy Judicial Circuit before going into private practice in Snellville, specializing in criminal and family law.
She served on the Snellville City Council for five years before being elected mayor of that city in 2011. She lost a reelection bid four years later.
She now serves as an attorney and guardian ad litem for the Gwinnett Juvenile Court.
Kautz graduated from the University of Georgia Law School and joined the bar in 2002. Kirk is a criminal and family law specialist in Suwanee. Before opening her practice in 2013, she served as a senior assistant prosecutor in the Gwinnett County DA's office.
Kirk is a graduate of the Georgia State University College of Law and joined the bar in 2004.
Parker is a Grayson solo who moved to Gwinnett in 1996 and practices general civil and criminal law. She is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School and joined the State Bar of Georgia in 1999.
Poll results:
Fluker: Well-qualified: 95 (28%); qualified: 96 (28%); not qualified: 44 (13%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 108 (31%).
Kautz: Well-qualified: 22 (6%); qualified: 62 (18%); not qualified: 107 (31%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 152 (44%).
Kirk: Well-qualified: 76 (22%); qualified: 86 (25%); not qualified: 37 (10%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 144 (42%).
Parker: Well-qualified: 5 (1%); qualified: 21 (6%); not qualified: 124 (36%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 193 (56%).
Schrader: Well-qualified: 127 (37%); qualified: 57 (17%); not qualified: 111 (32%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 48 (14%).
|State Court Judge
State Court Judge Shawn Bratton is being challenged by Matt Miller.
Bratton was appointed to the bench in 2014 by Deal, and handily won his first election to post in 2016.
Bratton served in the U.S. Navy before embarking on his legal career as an assistant prosecutor with the Walton County DA's office, moving to the Gwinnett solicitors general's office before going into civil practice as a litigator.
He is a graduate of Georgia State University School of Law and joined the bar in 2003.
Miller is currently a supervising attorney with the Gwinnett solicitor's office. Prior to that he had a solo Lawrenceville practice largely focused on criminal law.
He is a graduate of the University of Tennessee College of Law and joined the bar in 2006.
The poll results:
Bratton: Well-qualified: 184 (54%); qualified: 63 (18%); not qualified: 11 (3%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 85 (25%).
Miller: Well-qualified: 21 (6%); qualified: 68 (20%); not qualified: 94 (27%); not enough personal knowledge to answer: 160 (47%).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250