Ahead of Merger, Troutman Makes Pay Cuts, Firms Defer First Years
Troutman's pay cuts follow a similar move by Pepper earlier in May and mark the latest internal adjustments ahead of the July 1 merger.
May 26, 2020 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
Troutman Sanders confirmed it is cutting pay firmwide for lawyers and staff, effective June 1, following an announcement of similar compensation cuts by its merger partner, Pepper Hamilton, earlier this month.
Both firms also said on Friday that they will defer the start date of their combined first-year associate class from the fall to next January.
The moves represent the latest internal adjustments and preparations just ahead of the July 1 merger, which will form Troutman Pepper. The merger, initially scheduled for April 1, was announced last year to much fanfare, as it may create a new Am Law 50 firm. But, due to the novel coronavirus pandemic, Atlanta-based Troutman and Philadelphia-based Pepper pushed it back to July.
The merger is still on track, Troutman said in a Friday statement.
Troutman is implementing the firmwide pay cuts because of the uncertain economic environment amid the coronavirus pandemic, it said in the statement. The pay reductions for lawyers and staff will range from 2% to 18.5% on an annualized basis, and the duration depends "on the overall global economy and firm performance," it said.
"Troutman Sanders is in a strong financial position, with record financial performance through year-to-date 2020," the statement said. But it is reducing expenses because "the extent of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on our clients, and, therefore on our business, remains impossible to predict."
According to Above the Law, which first reported the pay reductions, equity partners are taking the deepest cuts. On an annualized basis, equity partners will take an 18.5% cut, non-equity partners will take a 14% cut and associates will take an 11.7% cut.
If the salary reductions continue through the end of the year, then, going forward, that works out to a 32% cut for equity partners, a 24% cut for nonequity partners and a 20% cut for associates from their pay for the remaining seven months of the year.
Pepper Hamilton said May 8 that it was cutting pay for attorneys and staff. At that time, Pepper said it was reducing distributions for partners by an unspecified amount and reducing salaries for all other attorneys by what would amount to under 12% on an annualized basis. It also reduced salaries for staff making $60,000 or more, ranging from 9% to 3% on an annualized basis.
In deferring their combined first-year associate class, Pepper and Troutman said they will provide financial assistance to defray living expenses and the cost of preparing for the bar exam. The incoming associates also will be able to enroll in the health insurance plan.
The firms had already announced April 10 that they were suspending their summer associate programs and that they would instead make job offers to the rising 3Ls to join the combined firm, Troutman Pepper, as associates in the fall of 2021. They gave rising 2Ls offers to return as summer associates next year.
Troutman had also announced in mid-April that it was offering some staff the option of a voluntary leave of absence, starting May 1. The firm offered those who participated full coverage of health insurance premiums and a weekly stipend in addition to state and federal unemployment benefits.
Troutman reported healthy gains in revenue and profits last year. In 2019, Troutman's revenue increased 5.4% to $549.6 million and net income increased 6.2% to $207.7 million. Profits per equity partner jumped 8.4% to $1.164 million.
Meanwhile, Pepper saw gross revenue grow 4.5% in 2019 to $349.4 million, after three years of declines. Revenue per lawyer was up 3.7%, at $818,000. The firm saw a 13.6% jump in profits per equity partner to $943,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readOn the Move: Freeman Mathis & Gary Adds Florida Partners, Employment Pro Joins Jackson Lewis
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Judge Tosses Antitrust Case Over Yacht Broker Commissions
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250