February Bar Exam Pass Rates Dip Slightly From Prior Year
The drop in the overall pass rate for Georgia law school graduates was consistent with the performance trend of test-takers nationally.
May 28, 2020 at 04:04 PM
4 minute read
Georgia law school graduates who sat for the February bar exam did not fare quite as well as the cohort the previous year.
Of the 65 first-time test-takers from Georgia's six law schools, 60% passed. That compared with a pass rate of 67.2% for the 66 first-time test-takers in February 2019, according to pass rate statistics released Thursday from the state's Office of Bar Admissions.
The overall pass rate for all 242 test-takers from Georgia law schools, including repeaters, was 40.1%. That was down slightly from those schools' 43.1% overall pass rate in February 2019.
The slight drop in the overall pass rate for Georgia law school graduates, from 43.1% to 40.1%, was consistent with the performance trend of test-takers nationally, said Georgia Office of Bar Admissions' director, Heidi Faenza.
Because the number of people sitting for the February bar exam is much smaller than for the July one, the results can be more inconsistent, Faenza said, explaining that having just a few more students pass or fail can markedly skew the percentages.
For example, Mercer University School of Law and Savannah Law School each posted a 100% first-time pass rate, but only two graduates of each school took the exam for the first time.
Mercer's overall pass rate was 44.1% and Savannah Law's was 52.9%
By contrast, the University of Georgia School of Law had only a 25% first-time pass rate, but only four first-time test-takers sat for the exam. UGA Law's overall pass rate was 31.3%.
Georgia State University College of Law fielded 18 first-time test-takers, of whom 88.9% passed. GSU Law's overall pass rate was 84.2%.
That was followed by Emory University, which had 16 first-time test-takers with a 50% pass rate. Emory Law's overall pass rate was 40.6%.
Atlanta's John Marshall Law School had 23 first-time test-takers, with a 43.5% pass rate. However, repeat test-takers pulled down its overall pass rate to 21.9%.
John Marshall Law graduates accounted for a full 43%, or 105, of the 242 graduates of Georgia law schools who took the February exam. The pass rate for its 82 repeaters was only 15.9%.
|Total Results
Overall, 536 people, including out-of-state law school graduates and attorneys barred in other states, took the February exam, which Faenza noted was just over 100 fewer than the February 2019 exam.
Of those, 43.5% passed. That was slightly lower than the February 2019 overall pass rate of 44.3%.
The overall February pass rate for all 246 first-time test-takers, including graduates of out-of-state law schools and attorneys barred in another state, was also down slightly, at 62.6%, compared with the 65.6% pass rate for all first-time test-takers in February 2019.
Attorneys already barred in another state were the best-performing cohort, with an 84% pass rate. That was up from an 80.7% pass rate for that group in February 2019.
Out-of-state law school graduates had a pass rate of 51%, which was up from the 47.7% pass rate for that group in February 2019.
"I'm just grateful that we all got out of the exam without people getting sick," said Faenza, noting that this year's exam took place from Feb. 25 to Feb. 26, right before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250