Former Congressman Jumps Into Federal Case Against Georgia Supreme Court Appointment
"This is not the law anywhere in the free world, and we intend to make sure that this will not be the law in Georgia for long," said former U.S. congressman and would-be Georgia Supreme Court candidate John Barrow.
May 29, 2020 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
Former Congressman John Barrow has filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit seeking to reinstate a canceled election for the Georgia Supreme Court.
"This Motion is timely, as Barrow's interests and rights have newly ripened," the Athens lawyer's legal team said in a pleading filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta.
The ripening of Barrow's interests was the Georgia Supreme Court's denial of his appeal seeking to compel Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to hold an election for Justice Keith Blackwell's job.
Blackwell announced his resignation just before qualifying to run for his office opened on March 1, but he didn't make his resignation effective until November. Barrow said he had been planning to challenge Blackwell, but was denied the opportunity when he showed up to qualify. Instead, Barrow said he was told Gov. Brian Kemp would appoint a replacement for Blackwell.
Barrow and another would-be candidate for Blackwell's job, former state Rep. Beth Beskin, D-Atlanta, filed a mandamus action to compel the reinstatement of the election. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Emily Richardson denied their request. Ultimately, the state Supreme Court affirmed her decision.
While waiting for the appeal to be decided, others sued in federal court over the same issue.
The federal plaintiffs are: Anne Glenn Weltner, the widow of former Georgia Supreme Court Justice Charles Weltner; Statesboro civil rights attorney and former Georgia NAACP president Francys Johnson Jr.; and Laura Register, a former member of the Grady County Board of Education. The case is before Senior Judge Orinda Evans. They contend that Raffensperger's decision to cancel the election violates federal civil rights laws.
Barrow agrees with them but has more to say.
"The legal framework announced by that decision violates Barrow's federal constitutional rights. Barrow has unique rights and interests in the subject of the pending action as a prospective candidate in an election for the office at issue, his rights and interests could be impaired by a ruling without his intervention, and the current parties do not adequately represent or protect his interests as a prospective candidate, which are distinct from the interests of the voter-Plaintiffs, despite the similar view of the law and facts that underlie this case," Barrow's motion said.
Barrow's legal team includes S. Lester Tate III, former chairman of the state Judicial Qualifications Commission which polices Georgia judges' ethical conduct, and a group from Pope McGlamry: former U.S. Attorney Michael Moore; Wade Tomlinson III; Charles Byrd; former U.S. Rep. Charles "Buddy" Darden III; Elizabeth White; and Michael Morrill.
Raffensperger's counsel, Attorney General Chris Carr, declined to comment.
Barrow said in a written statement that the Georgia Constitution mandates Supreme Court justices "shall be elected," and the U.S. Constitution does not allow an election to be "arbitrarily set aside." He said the high court's ruling as it stands gives any judge the personal power to "veto" the results of an election.
"It's a power that can be wielded solely at the whim of the incumbent judge and is an assault on the rights of Georgia voters," Barrow said.
"The Georgia Supreme Court has ruled that no one who wins an election to the Georgia Supreme Court has the right to take office unless the outgoing incumbent agrees to let the winner serve," Barrow said. "This is not the law anywhere in the free world, and we intend to make sure that this will not be the law in Georgia for long."
The case is Weltner, et al. v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-01407-ODE, pending before Judge Orinda Evans.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250