Amid Bankruptcy Wave, Mercer Law Launches to Represent Creditors, Nonbank Parties
Atlanta attorney Robert Mercer has gone solo to avoid any bank client conflicts.
June 08, 2020 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
After 20 years at larger firms, Robert Mercer has started his own bankruptcy and insolvency firm, Mercer Law.
Mercer's career change comes as bankruptcy and restructuring practices are expected to see higher demand this year amid the pandemic. Court closures have put somewhat of a damper on bankruptcy filings so far, Mercer said, but he expects to see more middle-market companies filing in Georgia by the fall.
"The collective wisdom is that, come August or September, those type of filings for the middle market will pick up," he said, noting the wave of national retail bankruptcies so far, such as J.C. Penney, J. Crew, Neiman Marcus—and, last week, glassmaker Libbey.
Somewhat uniquely, Mercer, who most recently practiced at Schulten Ward Turner & Weiss, does not represent banks in bankruptcies. Instead, he focuses on advising fiduciaries, creditors, borrowers and other parties. More recently, he has started advising plaintiffs firms in high-stakes class and collective action claims against corporations to protect plaintiffs' interests in the event of a judgment.
Going solo at Mercer Law allows Mercer to avoid any larger-firm bank conflicts, he said—and at 49, he was ready to run his own firm. "I really enjoy the practice of law. I felt like—life is short and this would be fun to do," he said.
Mercer started out at Powell Goldstein, where an early mentor was Wendy Hagenau, now the chief judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, then continued as a partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner after that firm acquired Powell Goldstein in 2009. For the past five years, he's been a partner at Schulten Ward, which he joined to avoid bank client conflicts at Bryan Cave, which has a large banking practice.
Mercer, who is financing his firm's launch through savings, said he'd already made the decision to open Mercer Law before the coronavirus pandemic hit. "I'd been thinking about this for a long time," he said.
He and Tasheba Fulcher, his assistant from Schulten Ward, moved into Mercer Law's new digs at the Promenade Building at 1230 Peachtree St. N.E. in May. Mercer said the office move was complicated by "wearing gloves and hand-sanitizing and not wanting to touch anything."
For his traditional bankruptcy practice representing significant parties other than banks, such as fiduciaries, boards of directors, asset purchasers and the like in insolvency cases, Mercer said his hourly rate is similar to that of a bankruptcy partner at his level at a large firm.
But, he added, "Now I have the luxury of taking cases that would be more difficult to take at a large law firm."
In some bankruptcy cases, he might represent parties—often on contingency—to challenge a leveraged buyout or other leveraged transaction of the bankrupt company as a fraudulent transfer in an effort to maximize its recovery.
He also advises plaintiffs lawyers in high-stakes class and collective actions against companies to preserve the plaintiffs' interests as potential creditors. "We want to make sure the plaintiffs' rights are protected—and there is money for a potential judgment," he explained.
For instance, plaintiffs firm Pope McGlamry brought Mercer in to represent plaintiffs' interests against Wright Medical Group after Stryker in November announced that it would acquire Wright Medical for $4 billion.
Pope McGlamry is lead plaintiffs counsel in multidistrict litigation against Wright Medical over defective hip implants. The MDL, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is made up of almost 2,000 plaintiffs' claims being settled for about $340 million, according to Pope McGlamry.
Mercer said he is working with Mike McGlamry and Kurt Pope to make sure the money is there for all of the injured plaintiffs. Neither Wright Medical or Stryker is in bankruptcy, Mercer noted, explaining that Stryker's tender offer is part of a complicated transaction, so his job is to assess it from a creditor standpoint. "We want to make sure that at the end of the day there is money for the plaintiffs and they don't get left out in the cold," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHurricane Helene's Impact On Asheville, North Carolina: How Public and Private Attorneys Dealt With Closures, Safety and Sanitation
Second Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 2Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 3Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 4Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 5USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250