Amid Bankruptcy Wave, Mercer Law Launches to Represent Creditors, Nonbank Parties
Atlanta attorney Robert Mercer has gone solo to avoid any bank client conflicts.
June 08, 2020 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
After 20 years at larger firms, Robert Mercer has started his own bankruptcy and insolvency firm, Mercer Law.
Mercer's career change comes as bankruptcy and restructuring practices are expected to see higher demand this year amid the pandemic. Court closures have put somewhat of a damper on bankruptcy filings so far, Mercer said, but he expects to see more middle-market companies filing in Georgia by the fall.
"The collective wisdom is that, come August or September, those type of filings for the middle market will pick up," he said, noting the wave of national retail bankruptcies so far, such as J.C. Penney, J. Crew, Neiman Marcus—and, last week, glassmaker Libbey.
Somewhat uniquely, Mercer, who most recently practiced at Schulten Ward Turner & Weiss, does not represent banks in bankruptcies. Instead, he focuses on advising fiduciaries, creditors, borrowers and other parties. More recently, he has started advising plaintiffs firms in high-stakes class and collective action claims against corporations to protect plaintiffs' interests in the event of a judgment.
Going solo at Mercer Law allows Mercer to avoid any larger-firm bank conflicts, he said—and at 49, he was ready to run his own firm. "I really enjoy the practice of law. I felt like—life is short and this would be fun to do," he said.
Mercer started out at Powell Goldstein, where an early mentor was Wendy Hagenau, now the chief judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, then continued as a partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner after that firm acquired Powell Goldstein in 2009. For the past five years, he's been a partner at Schulten Ward, which he joined to avoid bank client conflicts at Bryan Cave, which has a large banking practice.
Mercer, who is financing his firm's launch through savings, said he'd already made the decision to open Mercer Law before the coronavirus pandemic hit. "I'd been thinking about this for a long time," he said.
He and Tasheba Fulcher, his assistant from Schulten Ward, moved into Mercer Law's new digs at the Promenade Building at 1230 Peachtree St. N.E. in May. Mercer said the office move was complicated by "wearing gloves and hand-sanitizing and not wanting to touch anything."
For his traditional bankruptcy practice representing significant parties other than banks, such as fiduciaries, boards of directors, asset purchasers and the like in insolvency cases, Mercer said his hourly rate is similar to that of a bankruptcy partner at his level at a large firm.
But, he added, "Now I have the luxury of taking cases that would be more difficult to take at a large law firm."
In some bankruptcy cases, he might represent parties—often on contingency—to challenge a leveraged buyout or other leveraged transaction of the bankrupt company as a fraudulent transfer in an effort to maximize its recovery.
He also advises plaintiffs lawyers in high-stakes class and collective actions against companies to preserve the plaintiffs' interests as potential creditors. "We want to make sure the plaintiffs' rights are protected—and there is money for a potential judgment," he explained.
For instance, plaintiffs firm Pope McGlamry brought Mercer in to represent plaintiffs' interests against Wright Medical Group after Stryker in November announced that it would acquire Wright Medical for $4 billion.
Pope McGlamry is lead plaintiffs counsel in multidistrict litigation against Wright Medical over defective hip implants. The MDL, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is made up of almost 2,000 plaintiffs' claims being settled for about $340 million, according to Pope McGlamry.
Mercer said he is working with Mike McGlamry and Kurt Pope to make sure the money is there for all of the injured plaintiffs. Neither Wright Medical or Stryker is in bankruptcy, Mercer noted, explaining that Stryker's tender offer is part of a complicated transaction, so his job is to assess it from a creditor standpoint. "We want to make sure that at the end of the day there is money for the plaintiffs and they don't get left out in the cold," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
4 minute read28 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief
- 2Federal Judge Warns of 'Serious Sanctions' on FDIC Over Document Retention
- 3Meet the Former NFL Player Now Back at Vinson & Elkins
- 4Inside Track: Cooley's Modest Proposal to Make Executives Safer
- 5Justified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250