The old proverb warning that, but for the loss of a nail a kingdom would not have been lost, may be applicable to a medical malpractice case dismissed because of a pre-suit notice that failed to clearly identify where the plaintiff was treated.

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a man who claimed his lung cancer went untreated for several months, and sued multiple defendants including the Georgia University Board of Regents, which oversees the Augusta University Medical Center.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]