Judicial Emergency Extended 30 Days as Courthouses Prepare to Resume Most Operations
Fulton County courts are also preparing for a "soft opening" on Monday.
June 12, 2020 at 03:18 PM
5 minute read
Georgia's chief justice is extending the Supreme Court's statewide judicial emergency for another 30 days in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chief Justice Harold Melton said the new order forecasts "a more robust opening" of Georgia's courts, but also gives them time to prepare "to operate more fully as long as they can provide for the safety of all involved." Under the terms of the new order, "We will still be significantly restricted," he added.
The original order was issued in March.
Extending the statewide judicial emergency comes even though Gov. Brian Kemp signed a new executive order Thursday ending shelter-in-place requirements for residents and visitors 65 or older, allowing conventions, and eliminating other restrictions in place since April.
But Melton said the courts are proceeding cautiously because they're different from other public venues. "When courts operate, they require attendance of people to be there," he said. "Jurors are required to be there when we issue jury summonses. Parties are required to be there or face a risk of their cases being compromised."
The new order lays out a plan that as of July 14 will reimpose many legal deadlines on litigants in civil and criminal cases and in administrative actions that have been suspended, tolled, or extended since March. J ury trial and most grand jury proceedings will remain suspended, and jury proceedings are unlikely to begin until August or later, the order said. Deadlines imposed on courts, however, will also remain suspended because of the current backlog of pending cases, the order said.
Melton has established a pandemic task force that is currently working with lawyers' organizations, judicial councils, clerks' offices and other "critical stakeholders" across the state to begin restoring court operations suspended as the coronavirus swept through Georgia. The task force is headed by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shawn LaGrua, past president of the state Council of Superior Court Judges.
"Their mission is to talk about best practices, identify solutions to logistical questions, identify alternatives about how to operate when we open," he said. "They are basically working in anticipation for what the courts will look like post-COVID." That will include the safe resumption of jury trials and grand jury proceedings, according to Friday's order.
The state Judicial Council on Friday published guidelines for reopening that outline general practices to ensure the health and safety of court employees and the public. The guide includes general infection control measures the courts should undertake, including limiting room capacity, temperature screening at entry, requiring all employees and the public to wear masks inside court facilities, staggered scheduling, and continued use of virtual hearings via Zoom, YouTube or Facebook.
Melton issued a series of orders last month lifting most filing deadlines for cases pending before the Supreme Court of Georgia, which has been hearing oral arguments remotely.
In Atlanta, Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Christopher Brasher said Fulton County will implement those measures Monday and prepare for expanded in-court proceedings in what he called a "soft opening." Those guidelines establish procedures for admission to courthouse facilities that mirror those recommended by the state judicial council.
DeKalb Superior Court Clerk Continues Remote Ops Until July 13
Superior Court Clerk Debra DeBerry said that customers can continue to electronically file criminal, civil, and real estate documents and submit all inquiries at www.dksuperiorclerk.com. Notary renewals, applications and passports are issued by appointment only. Instructions for TPOs and ex parte hearings are at www.dksuperiorclerk.com/tpo.
Brasher said Fulton County has been working since May to establish operating guidelines governing courthouse entry for the public and employees, how to begin bringing county jail inmates back to court, and how to reinstate grand juries and jury trials.
"We want everybody who comes into the courthouse … to know we had everybody tested; nobody here is positive," he said.
Protective barriers have also been installed in offices and in courtrooms where staff interact with the public.
Three weeks ago, court personnel walked through the courthouse with a doctor from the county board of health and secured an extensive list of health safety recommendations that Brasher said have now been put in place.
"There won't be a dramatic uptick in the number of proceedings next week," the chief judge said. "We wanted to implement all the safeguards so we can begin ramping up."
Calendar calls of cases have not been reinstated. "Our paradigm for the foreseeable future is much smaller proceedings," he said. Social distancing marks placed on courtroom benches and courtrooms designed to hold 60 people will now be limited to about 20. Elevators will be limited to four people at a time, and sheriff's deputies are empowered to enforce social distancing requirements, he said.
Brasher said that court operations never completely shut down. "We have had multiple proceedings from the jail occurring every day via Zoom," he said. "Each judge is doing their own civil proceedings via Zoom as well. It's ubiquitous now."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to asset-and-logo-licensing@alm.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250