Defense Lawyers Counter Prosecutor's Narrative of Rayshard Brooks' Death
A veteran criminal defense attorney and his partner and two former prosecutors are representing two Atlanta police officers charged with multiple felonies in the death of Rayshard Brooks.
June 18, 2020 at 07:05 PM
5 minute read
Two Atlanta police officers charged in the fatal shooting of Rayshard Brooks have retained legal counsel who are challenging the narrative laid out by Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard in announcing the prosecutions.
Veteran criminal defense lawyer Don Samuel and partner Amanda Clark Palmer represent Devin Brosnan, the officer who first encountered Brooks asleep in his car in the drive-through line at a south Atlanta Wendy's.
Garrett Rolfe, who fired the fatal shots that struck Brooks in the back as he ran from the two officers with Brosnan's taser, has retained Atlanta attorney Lance LoRusso, a civil litigator who has represented more than 80 law enforcement officers in on-duty shootings and in-custody deaths. Noah Pines, a former DeKalb County prosecutor, and W.H. "Bill" Thomas, a former federal prosecutor and Los Angeles County deputy DA, joined Rolfe's defense team Thursday.
On Wednesday, Howard charged Rolfe with felony murder and multiple counts of aggravated assault, violating his oath of office, and first-degree criminal damage to property. Rolfe was also charged with failing to render medical aid after shooting Brooks. Howard charged Brosnan with aggravated assault, violating his oath of office and failure to render medical aid.
Atlanta police fired Rolfe within 24 hours of Brooks' death. Brosnan was placed on administrative duty and is free on a $50,000 signature bond. Rolfe is being held without bond.
Howard moved quickly to file multiple felony charges against the two officers as the use of excessive force, particularly against black men, has become the driving issue behind mass protests across the nation. The demonstrations were sparked by the May 25 death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police as bystanders begged for his life. Brooks' death came after Howard charged six Atlanta police earlier this month with multiple felonies in the tasing of two college students caught up in a downtown demonstration.
The lawyers for the two officers' challenged multiple statements Howard made in announcing the charges. "Never in my career have I seen a district attorney act so unethically without regard for his professional obligations in pursuit of re-election," Pines said in a news release.
Howard is seeking his seventh term as DA, but will face a runoff with Fani Willis, his former executive assistant DA.
Pines accused Howard of violating ethics rules that bar him from making "extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused." Pines also accused Howard of acting rashly by announcing charges before the Georgia Bureau of Investigation completed its investigation. The GBI issued a news release Thursday saying Howard did not alert them before filing charges.
Pines contended that Rolfe's actions were justified.
Brooks' sudden decision to struggle with the two officers as Rolfe began handcuffing him "constituted felony obstruction," Pines said. He also said that Brooks punched Rolfe in the face, took Brosnan's taser and tased him, then fled. As he ran, Pines said Rolfe "heard a sound like a gunshot and saw a flash in front of him, and so he did what any officer in that situation would do. He dropped his taser, pulled his gun, and fired it at Mr. Brooks."
Samuel said Howard's decision to charge Brosnan with multiple felonies caught him and Palmer by surprise. Brosnan suffered a concussion during the melee, Samuel said.
Samuel said that Brosnan gave a three-hour interview to senior assistant DA Clint Rucker before he was charged. And he characterized Brosnan's behavior prior to Rolfe's arrival at the Wendy's as "exemplary."
"He was considerate. He was compassionate," Samuel said. When he realized that Brooks was likely intoxicated and radioed for a DUI officer, Rolfe, whom he didn't know, showed up and took charge. Samuel said that when Rolfe decided to handcuff Brooks, he did so without signaling Brosnan, who was overpowered in the ensuing struggle.
When Brooks ran, with Rolfe in pursuit, Brosnan was still lying on the pavement. When Brosnan heard the shots, at first he wasn't sure who fired them and feared they came from a crowd that had gathered, the lawyer said.
Samuel said Howard's claim that Brosnan stood on Brooks' shoulders after he was shot isn't accurate. He said that Brosnan, still groggy from the blow to the head, put his foot briefly on Brooks's upper arm. "He was not assaulting him," he said. "He was not kicking him. He was trying to make sure he can't use that arm to grab some weapon."
Samuel said that before and after the DA's office filed the felony charges against Brosnan, Rucker asked him repeatedly whether Rolfe used excessive force. Samuel said he told the prosecutor, "Devin has no ability to give an opinion that is meaningful. … How many times do you ask people who have a concussion, 'What's your opinion of what happened when you didn't see it?" he said.
Samuel said that while Brosnan cooperated with the DA initially and is scheduled to give an interview to the GBI, "He has not agreed to a plea deal."
He said Howard "was either misinformed or misunderstood the situation" when he announced Brosnan had agreed to be a cooperating witness for the prosecution. "I don't think he was malicious," Samuel said. "He just wasn't accurate. Now my client is either accused of being a snitch, or changing his story. All my guy ever did was tell the truth about everything."
"He is never going to plead guilty, never," Samuel said. "Not with me standing at the podium."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readOn The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
6 minute readDid Ahmaud Arbery's Killers Get Help From Glynn County DA? Jury Hears Clashing Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250