Appeals Court Revives Suit Over Fatal Shooting at 'Murder Kroger'
The Court of Appeals said a man who approached his work truck when he saw someone in it didn't necessarily know he was about to have a fatal confrontation.
June 22, 2020 at 05:55 PM
6 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals revived a lawsuit stemming from the 2015 murder of a contractor who saw someone in his truck in a Kroger grocery store parking lot and was shot when he ran up to investigate.
A Fulton County judge ruled last year that the dead man, Joshua Richey, voluntarily placed himself in harm's way by approaching the truck and dismissed the case on summary judgment.
But the appeals opinion said a jury could conclude Richey had no way of knowing the person in his truck might be dangerous and "did not inject himself into imminent danger" by going to investigate.
"There were a number of arguments raised, but they ultimately ruled on the narrow issue of whether he was joining an affray, or mutual combat," said Hadden Law Firm principal John Hadden, who represents the dead man's wife along with Pete Law, Michael Moran and Denise Hoying of Law & Moran.
Their firm has a history with Kroger: Last year, a jury awarded $70 million to a Law & Moran client shot and paralyzed during a robbery at a Kroger on Moreland Avenue in Atlanta.
"There are cases that go both ways as to what the knowledge of the plaintiff has to be as far as exercising ordinary care," said Hadden. "We argued that, under the circumstances, what Mr Ritchey did was logical. We had a Kroger executive who said he didn't think Mr. Ritchey had done anything wrong."
The defendants are represented by Gray, Rust, St. Amand, Moffett & Brieske partners Matt Moffett and Jeff Wasick; and Copeland, Stair, Kingma & Lovell partners Charles McDaniel Jr. and Ryan Kolb.
Moffett said they were "carefully reviewing and considering the decision of the Court of Appeals."
The murder happened at the Kroger on Ponce de Leon Avenue. The store once enjoyed macabre fame as the "Murder Kroger," so called after a woman was killed in the parking lot in 1991 and a body was found in car there in 2002.
The appellant brief quoted the trial judge, Fulton County State Court Judge Wesley Tailor, as saying "Murder Kroger. That's what everybody knows it. I grew up in Atlanta and everybody knows it as murder Kroger. I get it."
The store has since been razed and replaced with a new "Beltline Kroger" near the Ponce City Market.
In 2015, Richey and another man, Jason Shelton, were working for a construction company clearing debris on Kroger's property behind the store.
Their trucks were parked in the lot when they saw a black car park pull next to Richey's. They then saw a man behind the wheel of his truck.
Richey and Shelton both jumped down and ran toward the trucks. Richey got there first and slapped on the driver's side window.
A man later identified as Damarius Thompson shot through the window, killing Richey, while Shelton dove for cover behind his truck.
Thompson was later convicted of murder for shooting Richey, and other crimes, and is serving two life sentences without parole.
Richey was married with four children, and in 2016 his wife Kathy sued Kroger and its security company, Norred & Associates, for negligent security.
The complaint argued that the store was in a known high-crime area and that Kroger was aware of several other attacks, shootings and robberies at its metro-area stores.
Tailor denied defense motions to dismiss, and each defendant filed motions for summary judgment arguing, among other things, that Richey "voluntarily joined an affray" by confronting Thompson instead of calling the police. Tailor agreed in 2019.
According to a transcript of the oral arguments, Tailor observed that the issue "needs to be probably addressed at the appellate level," and added that he would encourage just that "because I think this will help clarify the law in this regard. So I'll be happy to see what happens."
In reversing Tailor, Court of Appeals Judge Yette Miller wrote that there was no evidence to conclusively determine that Richey failed to exercise "ordinary care" for his safety.
"First, there is no evidence in the record that Richey saw Thompson with a weapon or otherwise observed or knew that he was armed," Miller said.
"Second, while we can glean that Richey ran toward Thompson after seeing him inside his truck without permission, Richey did not inject himself into an ongoing fight or situation which was violent, combative, or assaultive, such that he had a clear and palpable knowledge of the risk of being physically harmed."
"Third, the record does not show that Richey had any prior interaction or familiarity with Thompson which would have revealed that Thompson intended to harm him" or to fear a violent attack.
Because a reasonable jury could conclude that Richey did not knowingly subject himself to harm, "the summary adjudication of this case would usurp the province of the jury," said Miller, writing with the concurrence of Judges Amanda Mercier and Christian Coomer.
Hadden, an appellate specialist, said he was impressed with the defense team's work on the appeal.
"They did an outstanding job of briefing this case," he said. "I've done a lot of these, and this is one of the most well-briefed cases I've handled."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readWalmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250