Appeals Court Revives Suit Over Fatal Shooting at 'Murder Kroger'
The Court of Appeals said a man who approached his work truck when he saw someone in it didn't necessarily know he was about to have a fatal confrontation.
June 22, 2020 at 05:55 PM
6 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals revived a lawsuit stemming from the 2015 murder of a contractor who saw someone in his truck in a Kroger grocery store parking lot and was shot when he ran up to investigate.
A Fulton County judge ruled last year that the dead man, Joshua Richey, voluntarily placed himself in harm's way by approaching the truck and dismissed the case on summary judgment.
But the appeals opinion said a jury could conclude Richey had no way of knowing the person in his truck might be dangerous and "did not inject himself into imminent danger" by going to investigate.
"There were a number of arguments raised, but they ultimately ruled on the narrow issue of whether he was joining an affray, or mutual combat," said Hadden Law Firm principal John Hadden, who represents the dead man's wife along with Pete Law, Michael Moran and Denise Hoying of Law & Moran.
Their firm has a history with Kroger: Last year, a jury awarded $70 million to a Law & Moran client shot and paralyzed during a robbery at a Kroger on Moreland Avenue in Atlanta.
"There are cases that go both ways as to what the knowledge of the plaintiff has to be as far as exercising ordinary care," said Hadden. "We argued that, under the circumstances, what Mr Ritchey did was logical. We had a Kroger executive who said he didn't think Mr. Ritchey had done anything wrong."
The defendants are represented by Gray, Rust, St. Amand, Moffett & Brieske partners Matt Moffett and Jeff Wasick; and Copeland, Stair, Kingma & Lovell partners Charles McDaniel Jr. and Ryan Kolb.
Moffett said they were "carefully reviewing and considering the decision of the Court of Appeals."
The murder happened at the Kroger on Ponce de Leon Avenue. The store once enjoyed macabre fame as the "Murder Kroger," so called after a woman was killed in the parking lot in 1991 and a body was found in car there in 2002.
The appellant brief quoted the trial judge, Fulton County State Court Judge Wesley Tailor, as saying "Murder Kroger. That's what everybody knows it. I grew up in Atlanta and everybody knows it as murder Kroger. I get it."
The store has since been razed and replaced with a new "Beltline Kroger" near the Ponce City Market.
In 2015, Richey and another man, Jason Shelton, were working for a construction company clearing debris on Kroger's property behind the store.
Their trucks were parked in the lot when they saw a black car park pull next to Richey's. They then saw a man behind the wheel of his truck.
Richey and Shelton both jumped down and ran toward the trucks. Richey got there first and slapped on the driver's side window.
A man later identified as Damarius Thompson shot through the window, killing Richey, while Shelton dove for cover behind his truck.
Thompson was later convicted of murder for shooting Richey, and other crimes, and is serving two life sentences without parole.
Richey was married with four children, and in 2016 his wife Kathy sued Kroger and its security company, Norred & Associates, for negligent security.
The complaint argued that the store was in a known high-crime area and that Kroger was aware of several other attacks, shootings and robberies at its metro-area stores.
Tailor denied defense motions to dismiss, and each defendant filed motions for summary judgment arguing, among other things, that Richey "voluntarily joined an affray" by confronting Thompson instead of calling the police. Tailor agreed in 2019.
According to a transcript of the oral arguments, Tailor observed that the issue "needs to be probably addressed at the appellate level," and added that he would encourage just that "because I think this will help clarify the law in this regard. So I'll be happy to see what happens."
In reversing Tailor, Court of Appeals Judge Yette Miller wrote that there was no evidence to conclusively determine that Richey failed to exercise "ordinary care" for his safety.
"First, there is no evidence in the record that Richey saw Thompson with a weapon or otherwise observed or knew that he was armed," Miller said.
"Second, while we can glean that Richey ran toward Thompson after seeing him inside his truck without permission, Richey did not inject himself into an ongoing fight or situation which was violent, combative, or assaultive, such that he had a clear and palpable knowledge of the risk of being physically harmed."
"Third, the record does not show that Richey had any prior interaction or familiarity with Thompson which would have revealed that Thompson intended to harm him" or to fear a violent attack.
Because a reasonable jury could conclude that Richey did not knowingly subject himself to harm, "the summary adjudication of this case would usurp the province of the jury," said Miller, writing with the concurrence of Judges Amanda Mercier and Christian Coomer.
Hadden, an appellate specialist, said he was impressed with the defense team's work on the appeal.
"They did an outstanding job of briefing this case," he said. "I've done a lot of these, and this is one of the most well-briefed cases I've handled."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readWalmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store
Trending Stories
- 1Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 2DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 3Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 4In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 5Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250