Raffensperger Drops Rule Limiting Effort to Recall Waycross DA Involved in Ahmaud Arbery Case
The brief legal fight involved a restriction that people circulating a recall petition must be able to vote in that election.
June 22, 2020 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has agreed to drop a requirement restricting the ability of petitioners seeking to oust Waycross Circuit District Attorney George Barnhill, who is under fire for his role in delaying the investigation into the death of Ahmaud Arbery in Brunswick.
Georgia's Recall Petition Act contains a provision that people circulating a recall petition be eligible to vote in that election. A lawsuit was filed last week challenging that requirement as unconstitutional, and on Friday Raffensperger's office entered into a consent order agreeing not to enforce the provision.
The lawyer representing the plaintiffs—a Waycross pastor and another circuit resident, and a woman who lives in Henry County outside of Barnhill's circuit—said the case settled without any opposition filings by Raffensperger's office.
"It basically settled on the motions," said Atlanta solo Bryan Sells. "When the secretary of state's office read our brief and the cases we cited, they basically agreed with us that U.S. Supreme Court decisions had rendered the restrictions unconstitutional."
Sell said his clients and their supporters have already submitted more than 200 names to Raffensperger's office seeking permission to circulate the petitions, twice as many as required for the recall effort.
Sells said he expects the secretary to sign off on that effort shortly.
Once approved, petitioners will have 45 days to collect the signatures of at least 30% of the eligible voters in Barnhill's last election, which is about 22,000 registered voters.
The joint motion for a consent order, signed by Sells and the secretary of state's general counsel, C. Ryan Germany, said the litigants "have agreed that it is in the best interest of all parties that this lawsuit be resolved without further litigation. Moreover, the parties agree that the voter registration requirement is likely unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's decision in Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation … and subsequent cases."
"In 1999—ten years after the General Assembly adopted the voter-registration requirement at issue here—the Supreme Court addressed a nearly identical voter-registration requirement for initiative petition circulators in Buckley, and it concluded that the requirement imposed an unconstitutional burden on the plaintiffs' rights under the First Amendment," the motion said.
District Judge Leigh May of Georgia's Northern District Court signed the judgment Friday.
"The First Amendment right to free speech has served as the bedrock of freedom and democracy in the United States since its founding," said Raffensperger's communications manager Walter Jones via email.
"There is rightly a high bar in American society for restrictions of freedom of speech," he said. "Open political speech and lively debate have allowed America to grow and thrive into the vibrant democracy it is today."
Arbery was killed Feb. 23 in Glynn County after being chased at gunpoint by Travis McMichael and his father, Gregory McMichael, who along with William "Roddie" Bryant faces murder charges.
The killing happened in Glynn County, which is not in Barnhill's circuit. But he involved himself the next day by advising the Glynn County Police Department that he didn't think there was any reason to arrest anyone for Arbery's death.
On Feb. 27, Glynn County DA Jackie Johnson recused because the elder McMichael had worked for her office, and the case was assigned to Barnhill.
More than a month later, Barnhill announced that he was going to recuse because of connections between Gregory McMichael and Barnhill's son, a lawyer in Johnson's office, and again told Glynn County police not to make any arrests. Barnhill recused on April 7, and the attorney general tapped Cobb County District Attorney Joyette M. Holmes to take over the case.
Last month, Carr asked the U.S Department of Justice and Georgia Bureau of Investigation to look into Johnson and Barnhill's handling of the Arbery case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250