The Georgia Supreme Court on Monday upended more than a decade of case law, ruling that someone who helped cause a drunk-driving accident but was not the DUI driver could still be considered an “active tortfeasor” liable for uncapped punitive damages.

The unanimous decision by Justice Michael Boggs held that whether someone is an “active” or “passive” tortfeasor is a question for the jury or factfinder. Justice Charles Bethel issued a concurrence, urging the Legislature to “consider whether our interpretation of [statutory] language is, in fact, the desired law of Georgia.”                                  

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]