In Prosecuting Police, Atlanta DA Has Contradictory Stance on Taser's Deadliness, Defense Says
A Fulton County Superior Court judge on Tuesday set a $500,000 bond for former Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe.
June 30, 2020 at 06:39 PM
5 minute read
Defense lawyers who secured a $500,000 bond Tuesday for the fired Atlanta police officer who fatally shot Rayshard Brooks said the shooting was justified based on an earlier determination by District Attorney Paul Howard that a taser is a deadly weapon.
The defense also criticized Howard during Tuesday's hearing for previously making two stunning allegations when announcing felony charges against officers Garrett Rolfe and Devin Bronson at June 17 news conference. Rolfe attorney Noah Pines said his client never kicked Brooks as he lay dying on the pavement and never uttered the phrase, "I got him," after shooting Brooks twice in the back, as Howard claimed.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jane Barwick set bond on Rolfe, who faces charges including felony murder, aggravated assault, criminal damage to property, violating his oath of office, and failing to render medical aid. Prosecutors contend that while both officers did render medical aid to Brooks, they waited about two minutes before doing so.
At the DA's request, Rolfe has been held without bond since the charges were filed.
Brosnan, who is free on a $50,000 signature bond, also faces multiple felony charges, including aggravated assault, violating his oath of office, and failure to render medical aid.
But the legal debate at the heart of the charges against the two officers over whether or not the deadly shooting was justified that surfaced at Rolfe's bond hearing also highlight contradictory positions that Howard has taken on whether a taser is a deadly weapon in pursuing felony charges against a total of eight Atlanta police officers since George Floyd was asphyxiated by Minneapolis police in May.
Pines cited a felony warrant that Howard's investigator obtained against one of six police officers currently facing aggravated assault and other felony charges in a case that sprang from demonstrations in Atlanta following Floyd's death.
Howard filed multiple felonies against the officers after two college students—Messiah Young and Taniyah Pilgrim—were tasered and dragged from their car during demonstrations in downtown Atlanta on May 30 as police sought to enforce a curfew. Young also suffered a broken wrist and a gash that required stitches, and both students were handcuffed for hours in a police van while being denied protective masks. The warrant justified the felony charges in those cases by describing the taser as a deadly weapon.
But in announcing charges against Rolfe and Brosnan, Howard said the taser Brooks took from Brosnan was inoperative because it had already been fired twice and so posed no threat to the officers.
Executive Assistant DA Clint Rucker fought throughout the hearing to prevent Rolfe's release, calling the late-night shooting that began as a report of a man passed out in his car in a fast-food drive-thru "excessive" and "unnecessary."
Rucker said Brooks was not an immediate threat to Rolfe because he was running away, and that the shooting was unjustified—an argument he sought to use to question Rolfe's good character and whether he could be trusted not to flee if free on bond.
But Pines said Brooks was shot after he committed multiple felonies as he fought the officers after Rolfe attempted to handcuff him for being too intoxicated to drive. Brooks punched Rolfe in the face, knocked Brosnan to the pavement so hard he suffered a concussion, wrested away Brosnan's taser and tasered the officer, then fired the taser at Rolfe as he ran, Pines said. Brooks was shot just after turning and firing the taser at Rolfe in what Pines contended was an aggravated assault.
In a brief filed with the court prior to the bond hearing, Pines argued that Rolfe was justified in using deadly force if he reasonably believed that Brooks possessed a deadly weapon. And, he added, Howard's office has already determined in bringing felony aggravated assault charges against six other Atlanta police that a taser fits that description and that firing it is an assault.
Rolfe's bond also included a number of conditions, among them a requirement that Rolfe wear an ankle monitor, abide by a curfew and not have contact with any Atlanta police. But Barwick rejected one unorthodox request from by Rucker that as a condition of bond, Rolfe be forced to provide prosecutors with the passcode to his cell phone, which prosecutors have so far been unable to unlock.
Barwick agreed with Pines and co-counsel Lance LoRusso that prosecutors' search and seizure of evidence was a matter for another hearing and that ordering him to surrender his passcode in order to secure a bond would violate his rights.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
Georgia Law Firm's Longtime Office Manager Charged With Theft of IOLTA Funds
4 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250