'Legal Fiction': Former Prosecutors Criticize Paul Howard for Issuing Grand Jury Subpoena Without a Grand Jury
Grand juries have been suspended in Fulton County since March because of COVID-19, but that didn't stop Howard from issuing a grand jury subpoena involving an officer charged in the death of Rayshard Brooks.
July 08, 2020 at 05:07 PM
4 minute read
Three former prosecutors say Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard has issued an invalid grand jury subpoena for police records tied to a former officer charged with fatally shooting Rayshard Brooks.
Former DeKalb County District Attorney Jeff Brickman and former Cobb County DA Tom Charron said Howard's issuance of a grand jury subpoena without actually having a grand jury impaneled violates a state requirement that subpoenas be tied to a specific court date. No grand jury has been impaneled in Fulton County since March 13 because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
"You cannot issue a subpoena to a grand jury that does not exist," Brickman said. "It's a legal fiction, and it's improper. If I tried to issue a subpoena to a grand jury that simply doesn't exist, I would be laughed out of court."
"If you don't have a grand jury impaneled, that's a problem" and any subpoena issued without a grand jury would be null and void, said Charron, a former president of the National District Attorneys Association,
The sought-after documents are associated with an open internal "use of force" investigation into officer Garrett Rolfe, according to the subpoena. Rolfe shot Brooks in a fast-food parking lot in south Atlanta at the end of what began as a misdemeanor traffic stop on June 12.
Lawyers for the officers said the use of lethal force was warranted because Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted both officers, took one officer's Taser and then fired it at the other officer while trying to flee.
Former DeKalb County District Attorney J. Tom Morgan, now a criminal justice instructor at Western Carolina University, recalled that when he was DA, a young assistant unwittingly issued a grand jury document subpoena even though the county grand jury was not in session. DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Hilton Fuller held the young prosecutor in contempt, Morgan said. "We apologized profusely," he recalled. Fuller, he said, warned them "to never let it happen again."
On Tuesday, Howard said his office proactively sent grand jury subpoenas in advance of the expiration of a statewide judicial emergency order in the hopes that a grand jury might be able to convene.
The statewide judicial emergency order currently in place provides limited leeway for grand juries to convene, but only if they were already impaneled before March 14 or were recalled from a previous term while abiding by COVID-19 health directives. Fulton County had no grand jury empaneled when the statewide emergency took effect.
The current emergency order expires July 14 but Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Harold Melton announced at a meeting of the state Judicial Council this week that he will extend the current emergency order through Aug. 11.
Howard acknowledged that means he will not be able to impanel a grand jury for another month. He said when grand jury proceedings resume, his office "will resend the subpoenas at that time."
But the DA also questioned why he should have to issue a grand jury subpoena for police documents and evidence he deems "necessary in an investigation of one of their own employees."
When Howard announced multiple felony charges against Rolfe and fellow officer Devin Brosnan five days after Brooks was killed, the district attorney said a grand jury would not be impaneled until October at the earliest.
Rolfe faces charges of felony murder, aggravated assault, criminal damage to property, violating his oath of office, and failing to render medical aid. He is currently free on a $500,000 bond.
Brosnan, who is free on a $50,000 signature bond, also faces multiple felony charges, including aggravated assault, violating his oath of office, and failure to render medical aid.
Atlanta city attorney Nina Hickson declined to comment on the status of the subpoena.
But Rolfe defense counsel Noah Pines said issuing a grand jury subpoena when no grand jury is impaneled violates a state bar rule prohibiting records subpoenas "when there was no hearing, trial or deposition pending that would have supported the issuance of the subpoena." The maximum penalty for violating the rule is disbarment.
"The Georgia Supreme Court's rules and the law governing lawyers is clear," Pines said. "Lawyers cannot act like Paul Howard has acted in this case."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250