Judicial Leadership Backs Chief Justice's Warning of Discipline for Ignoring COVID-19 Orders
Leadership said judges need clear guidance on what is expected of them during the pandemic.
July 10, 2020 at 04:52 PM
4 minute read
Members of the state's judicial leadership say they largely approve of a warning from Chief Justice Harold Melton that judges could face ethics violations if they push forward with in-person court proceedings despite health risks from COVID-19.
"I don't have a problem with the chief justice's warning," said Henry County Chief Superior Court Judge Brian Amero, who is president of the state Council of Superior Court Judges. "What I worry about sometimes is the fluidity of the public health guidelines" and "whether or not judges will have clear notice of what they are expected to do."
"I think that the judges want to follow public health guidelines, and yet sometimes I hear that they're getting inconsistent advice, and that concerns me, especially if they are going to be held to that advice," he said.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Christopher Brasher said he understands the chief justice's decision that noncompliance with his new order could violate the state Code of Judicial Conduct.
"I'm sorry that it's necessary, but it is," he said. "We need to establish, maintain, and enforce boundaries … for ourselves as well as for society as a whole. I took Justice Melton's admonition to be exactly that—an admonition we need to … administer justice and keep people safe."
Melton issued a new order extending the statewide judicial emergency for a fourth time on Friday. That order extends the current judicial emergency through Aug. 11 and contains "stronger, more mandatory language" requiring judges to heed public health directives about COVID-19 before they fully restore court operations.
The order will also address concerns raised by the state's judiciary councils and members of the State Bar of Georgia alarmed that some judges are compelling in-person court appearances by lawyers and litigants while ignoring public health guidelines intended to curtail the virus' spread.
Some courthouses across Georgia are closing again after employees and judges who were restoring court operations tested positive for COVID-19.
Melton said the new order will require isolation or quarantine for all court employees suspected of or known to have been exposed to the virus. Those who test positive must participate in contact tracing.
The chief justice put Judicial Council members on notice that judges who ignore the terms of his new emergency declaration could face discipline by the state Judicial Qualifications Commission.
Cobb County Probate Judge Kelli Wolk, president of the Council of Probate Court Judges, said she has received reports from her membership that some judges have pushed to restore court operations because they are concerned about a growing case backlog.
For judges unwilling to make accommodations favoring public safety, "It's OK that they be held accountable," she said. "I think the JQC being involved is appropriate as long as there is clear guidance as to what amounts to a failure. If you are going to be told you are failing and negligent or harmful, you need to know clearly what's expected of you."
"I think the shift from guidance to direction will be welcomed by a lot of the judges I am speaking with," she added. "I think it's a necessary element before you start talking about punishment."
Georgia State Court of Appeals Judge Ken Hodges, a member of the chief justice's pandemic task force that is compiling a list of best practices for the judiciary going forward, said he "wholeheartedly" supports giving the JQC authority to discipline judges who ignore COVID-19 public health guidelines. Hodges said that following the recent death of Alcovy Circuit Superior Court Judge Horace Johnson Jr., he was contacted by people concerned that litigants and lawyers were expected in court even though court employees had tested positive for the virus.
"I think when judges require people to come to court, and there is known COVID in that courthouse, we shouldn't tolerate that," he told fellow judges on Monday's judicial council call. "It's irresponsible." And, he added, "We don't need any more funerals."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Begins 2025 With Boston Laterals and Deals
- 2Vinson & Elkins Expands Environmental Team with Chair of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
- 3From Courtrooms to Conversations: The Unexpected Joys of Podcasting as a Lawyer
- 4'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
- 5Drake Sues UMG for Defamation Over Promotion of False Claims of Pedophilia
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250