Judicial Leadership Backs Chief Justice's Warning of Discipline for Ignoring COVID-19 Orders
Leadership said judges need clear guidance on what is expected of them during the pandemic.
July 10, 2020 at 04:52 PM
4 minute read
Members of the state's judicial leadership say they largely approve of a warning from Chief Justice Harold Melton that judges could face ethics violations if they push forward with in-person court proceedings despite health risks from COVID-19.
"I don't have a problem with the chief justice's warning," said Henry County Chief Superior Court Judge Brian Amero, who is president of the state Council of Superior Court Judges. "What I worry about sometimes is the fluidity of the public health guidelines" and "whether or not judges will have clear notice of what they are expected to do."
"I think that the judges want to follow public health guidelines, and yet sometimes I hear that they're getting inconsistent advice, and that concerns me, especially if they are going to be held to that advice," he said.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Christopher Brasher said he understands the chief justice's decision that noncompliance with his new order could violate the state Code of Judicial Conduct.
"I'm sorry that it's necessary, but it is," he said. "We need to establish, maintain, and enforce boundaries … for ourselves as well as for society as a whole. I took Justice Melton's admonition to be exactly that—an admonition we need to … administer justice and keep people safe."
Melton issued a new order extending the statewide judicial emergency for a fourth time on Friday. That order extends the current judicial emergency through Aug. 11 and contains "stronger, more mandatory language" requiring judges to heed public health directives about COVID-19 before they fully restore court operations.
The order will also address concerns raised by the state's judiciary councils and members of the State Bar of Georgia alarmed that some judges are compelling in-person court appearances by lawyers and litigants while ignoring public health guidelines intended to curtail the virus' spread.
Some courthouses across Georgia are closing again after employees and judges who were restoring court operations tested positive for COVID-19.
Melton said the new order will require isolation or quarantine for all court employees suspected of or known to have been exposed to the virus. Those who test positive must participate in contact tracing.
The chief justice put Judicial Council members on notice that judges who ignore the terms of his new emergency declaration could face discipline by the state Judicial Qualifications Commission.
Cobb County Probate Judge Kelli Wolk, president of the Council of Probate Court Judges, said she has received reports from her membership that some judges have pushed to restore court operations because they are concerned about a growing case backlog.
For judges unwilling to make accommodations favoring public safety, "It's OK that they be held accountable," she said. "I think the JQC being involved is appropriate as long as there is clear guidance as to what amounts to a failure. If you are going to be told you are failing and negligent or harmful, you need to know clearly what's expected of you."
"I think the shift from guidance to direction will be welcomed by a lot of the judges I am speaking with," she added. "I think it's a necessary element before you start talking about punishment."
Georgia State Court of Appeals Judge Ken Hodges, a member of the chief justice's pandemic task force that is compiling a list of best practices for the judiciary going forward, said he "wholeheartedly" supports giving the JQC authority to discipline judges who ignore COVID-19 public health guidelines. Hodges said that following the recent death of Alcovy Circuit Superior Court Judge Horace Johnson Jr., he was contacted by people concerned that litigants and lawyers were expected in court even though court employees had tested positive for the virus.
"I think when judges require people to come to court, and there is known COVID in that courthouse, we shouldn't tolerate that," he told fellow judges on Monday's judicial council call. "It's irresponsible." And, he added, "We don't need any more funerals."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCobb County Says Over 3K Absentee Ballots Mailed Late, Just Days Before Election
2 minute readGa. High Court Upholds Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Protests at State Capitol
3 minute readGa. Prosecutor Who Brought Election Case Against Trump Faces Rare Republican Challenger
5 minute readAppeals Court in Crucial Georgia Won't Expedite Case on Election Certification
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250