![](https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2019/05/Pete-Law-and-Mike-Moran-Article-201905141927.jpg)
Judge Keeps Most of $70M Verdict in Place Against Kroger Over Robbery-Shooting
The DeKalb County judge trimmed $8 million off the verdict but found it "cannot be said to be excessive warranting a new trial." Kroger is appealing the ruling.
July 15, 2020 at 01:09 PM
5 minute read
A DeKalb County judge refused to order a new trial in the case of a young man awarded nearly $70 million last year after being shot and paralyzed at a Moreland Avenue Kroger store but did shave more than $8 million off the judgment over what he deemed inflated future medical expenses.
Kroger, which had asked for a new trial or judgment despite the verdict, last week filed a notice that it will appeal the ruling by State Court Judge Wayne Purdom that left the lion's share of the award in place.
The case began in 2015 when Laquan Taylor, then a 26-year-old Navy veteran, was accosted by two men in the Kroger parking lot who pulled a gun on him, took his wallet and the keys to his Camaro and shot him at least 11 times, leaving him for dead.
The car was equipped with a tracking device, and police quickly arrested Victor Moore and Javon Ross, who are each serving 15-year sentences after pleading guilty to multiple charges.
In April 2019, a jury awarded Taylor $81 million in damages, but it apportioned 14% of the fault to his assailants for a verdict against Kroger of $69,660,000.
The award included $60 million for Taylor's "pain and suffering, mental suffering, physical injury, inconvenience, and physical impairment in the past and into the future."
Lead plaintiffs attorney Pete Law said he understood Purdom's reasoning in reducing the amount for Taylor's future medical bills and was gratified the judge found the circumstances of Taylor's injuries justified the hefty verdict.
"Judge Purdom's order clearly said this was a case like no other," said Law, who represented Taylor at trial with Law & Moran colleagues E. Michael Moran, Brian Kaplan and Denise Hoying.
Kroger was represented at trial by Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial partners Jonathan Krawcheck, Richard Hill II and Frederick Cooper IV.
After the trial, Kroger filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial or alternatively, remittitur—a court order lowering the amount granted by the jury—recruiting Holland & Knight partner Laurie Webb Daniel and associate Jonathan Spital to lead the effort.
Taylor's team brought aboard Bondurant Mixson & Elmore partners Michael Terry and Naveen Ramachandrappa to fight the move.
In March, Terry and Daniel argued the motion before Purdom via Zoom.
Kroger contended among other things that the court had allowed in evidence of unrelated, dissimilar crimes and unrelated security measures at other stores and that improper "send a message" arguments were made during closing.
"This patently excessive verdict obviously is the result of passion and prejudice, not the outcome of a fair trial," said the store's motion.
It also challenged the award of $3.5 million in future lost wages and future medical expenses of $13 million as "unsupported by any evidence."
In his June 17 order, Purdom wrote that based upon his past treatments and likely "repetitive" future treatments, Taylor's future medical bills would likely be no more than $3.5 million, and the jury's award was "against the weight of the evidence." He reduced them by $8.2 million.
The rest of the judgment was supported by the evidence, Purdom wrote, noting that the incident involved more than a simple "spinal cord injury case."
Taylor "was ambushed out of the blue while carrying out routine daily activities," Purdom wrote.
"It was senseless—he had complied with the demands of the criminal without resistance. Thinking he was past the danger point he was shot in the back and then repeatedly shot again as he fled for his life and lay helpless on the ground, before being left for dead," the order reads. "In essence, he went through the experience of being the victim of a senseless murder, except somehow, due to expert medical intervention, he unexpectedly survived."
The formerly "healthy, fit, handsome, vibrant and outgoing young man" underwent multiple "grueling" surgeries, the judge wrote. His marriage ended, and the spinal cord injury that only "allows him to walk short distances with great difficulty using crutches and braces … is life-long," he said.
Under the circumstances, he said, the jury's verdict "cannot be said to be excessive warranting a new trial."
On June 22 Taylor's counsel submitted a notice of acceptance of remittitur, and on July 6 Kroger filed its notice of appeal.
Law said he would shortly be asking the court to order Kroger to post an appeal bond for $25 million, the statutory limit for such bonds under Georgia law.
Daniel said via email that she did not have permission to discuss the case.
Law praised the counsel for both sides in handling the motions.
"Laurie Webb Daniel and Mike Terry are so professional; they really did a great job," he said.
Taylor, he said "is doing about as would be expected. He suffers greatly every day, but he still has such a positive attitude."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Hungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus Hungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/07/Papa-Johns-Sign-1-767x633.jpg)
Hungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute read![Walmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store Walmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/03/wAdobeStock_246608594-767x633.jpg)
Walmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store
![Parent of Perkins, Huddle House Hires Ex-Panera GC as Legal Chief Parent of Perkins, Huddle House Hires Ex-Panera GC as Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/06/Perkins-Family-Restaurant-767x633.jpg)
![Century-Old Books-A-Million Hires GC to Help Plot Next Chapter Century-Old Books-A-Million Hires GC to Help Plot Next Chapter](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/06/Books-A-Million-Store-767x633-1.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250