What Georgia's AG Is Spending to Fight for the State's Abortion Law
And the case appears likely to continue. "We will appeal the Court's decision," Kemp said after the ruling in a statement. "Georgia values life, and we will keep fighting for the rights of the unborn."
July 15, 2020 at 04:31 PM
4 minute read
The state of Georgia has already paid more than $300,000 to the Washington, D.C.-based law firm hired to defend its statutory ban on abortion, according to Attorney General Chris Carr.
The state's outside counsel for the abortion battle is Consovoy McCarthy in Washington. The Consovoy team includes: Jeffrey M. Harris, Patrick Strawbridge and Steven Begakis. Harris argued for the state in the latest federal court hearing.
"The total cost for the state on this matter currently is $307,187.80 for attorney's fees and related expenses," Carr's office said Tuesday in response to an open records act inquiry.
And the case appears likely to continue. Carr said he plans to appeal a federal judge's ruling Monday that the law is unconstitutional. That could mean further fighting at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge precedent legalizing abortion, beginning with the 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade.
Attorneys challenging the law plan to ask the court to order the state to pay their legal fees as well.
"I can't predict what that will be," said lead plaintiffs counsel, ACLU Georgia Legal Director Sean J. Young. "But the state could be on the hook for it."
Young noted the state of Alabama has already paid $2 million for the ACLU's legal costs for defeating other abortion bans. That would include the $1.7 million Alabama paid to the ACLU after federal courts struck down a 2013 law that required doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at hospitals near the clinics where they were working. Plus, in 2019, a federal court ordered Alabama to pay $675,964 for the other side's legal fees after the state lost on an attempt to ban a common second-trimester abortion procedure.
That doesn't include the latest and most extreme Alabama abortion law: a total ban passed last year. District Judge Myron Thompson of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama has already struck down that law and is now considering ordering the state to pay legal fees in that case. The judge has asked for additional briefing on the amount of the fees and is planning a hearing.
Young expressed the hope that the fight could be over for Georgia.
"It's up to the state," he said.
But no chance it's over, according to Gov. Brian Kemp.
"We will appeal the Court's decision," Kemp said after the ruling in a statement posted on Twitter. "Georgia values life, and we will keep fighting for the rights of the unborn."
District Judge Steve Jones of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Monday granted summary judgment to SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective and other groups challenging the law that the Georgia General Assembly passed and Kemp signed in 2019.
The judge also denied the state's motion for summary judgment and enjoined the state and all defendants from enforcing the law created by House Bill 481. The law bans abortion as soon as a health professional can detect fetal cardiac activity—which could be as early as six weeks into pregnancy—with limited exceptions for rape reported to police or fatal medical conditions.
Jones ruled that SisterSong and other civil rights and advocacy groups "have established that H.B. 481 is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it prohibits abortions at a pre-viability point in pregnancy."
Viability is the standard first set in Roe v. Wade and other rulings on a woman's right to make decisions regarding abortion. Until now, abortion restrictions upheld by the courts have been based on whether a fetus could survive outside a uterus. The viable gestational age has moved to earlier in pregnancy in recent years with advances in medical care, but both sides of the debate put it well beyond 20 weeks. Georgia already had a 20-week abortion ban, signed into law by Gov. Nathan Deal in 2012.
With the federal judge's ruling Monday permanently enjoining the state from enforcing the new approximately six-week ban, Georgia's law continues as it was before 2019 bill passed—with abortion legal up until 20 weeks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250