Cornelia Lawyer Charged With Forging Signatures of Judge and Prosecutor
Jake York was charged with forging the names of Habersham Superior Court Judge Chan Caudell and an assistant district attorney on an order removing a client's ankle monitor.
July 17, 2020 at 03:16 PM
4 minute read
A Cornelia attorney is free on bond after being arrested for allegedly forging the signatures of Habersham County Superior Court Judge B. Chan Caudell and an assistant district attorney in an effort to have a client's ankle monitor removed.
Paul "Jake" York, who runs a solo practice and serves as solicitor for the city of Cornelia, was arrested July 10 and charged with two counts of forgery and one count of filling a false document after the Georgia Bureau of Investigation looked into the March incident.
York, 41, was released from the Habersham County Jail after posting a $6,900 bond.
Mountain Judicial Circuit District Attorney George Christian said his office recused "because one of my ADAs is a victim" in the case. The case was assigned to Piedmont DA Brad Smith, who did not respond to requests for comment.
York, a 2014 graduate of Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, did not respond to email or phone inquiries.
As first reported by Cornelia's Northeast Georgian newspaper, York was representing a woman charged with aggravated stalking after contacting her husband in violation of a no-contact order stemming from an earlier incident in which she allegedly struck him.
The woman, Valerie Ryals, was ordered to wear an ankle monitor.
As detailed in court documents, York had asked ADA Meredith Davis to sign off on a bond modification allowing Ryals to have the monitor removed because it was costing the single mother of two children $380 every two weeks in a case he thought was likely to be dismissed.
On March 9, York filed an order allowing the device to be removed, purportedly signed by Caudell and Davis.
Three days later, Caudell entered an order to set aside the consent order, writing that Davis had said she never signed the order and that he "also has concerns" about his purported signature.
"The court does not recall signing the order. The date the order was purportedly signed, March 4, 2020, the undersigned was not in the circuit and was unavailable to to sign the order," Caudell wrote.
Attached to the order is a transcript of a phone call between Caudell, York, Davis and Christian in which York denied signing Caudell's signature but conceded to signing Davis' because he thought she had agreed to the modification.
"I mean, I thought we had hammered that out yesterday where she gave me the green light," York is quoted in the transcript.
"Bad assumption on my part, I guess," he said.
Davis said she had made clear to York that she could not agree to any such modification until she talked to Ryals' ex-husband.
Davis is quoted saying she had no idea the bracelet was removed until her investigator texted her.
"I did not agree to do this," she said. "I had no idea this was being done."
Caudell also said that he didn't think his signature was real.
"Well, I would just be frank with you," he said. "This doesn't look like my signature. … I couldn't swear that it's not, but I don't—it doesn't look like my signature."
Christian noted that all three signatures were apparently signed by the same pen, to which Caudell responded that he makes a habit of "never signing a document, particularly an order, unless I put a date on it. I never, never would sign an order and leave it without a date. All right? So—and I was in Atlanta on the 4th."
Christian said the matter was "at least a Bar issue and, at most, a cause to referral to the GBI for investigation."
York said he apparently misunderstood his communications with Davis.
"How I went about doing it, I'm not going to sit here and say that was the best way to do things," he said. "It was not. It was stupid."
Caudell agreed with Christian that "at a minimum, this is going to be a Bar referral."
"This is serious," said the judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250