Virus Forces Georgia Bar Exam to Shift From In-Person to Online
The test will include essay questions on state law developed by the Georgia Board of Bar Examiners.
July 20, 2020 at 02:26 PM
3 minute read
The coronavirus crisis prompted the Supreme Court of Georgia Monday to cancel the in-person Georgia bar exam scheduled for September and replace it with an online exam administered Oct. 5-6.
Heidi Faenza, the director of the Office of Bar Admissions, said "very specific information" about registering for the October exam and other matters will be available on her office's website next Monday, July 27.
Faenza allowed that the online exam will include multiple choice questions provided by the National Council of Bar Examiners, although not the 200 usually given; one skills performance question provided by NCBE; and essay questions on state law developed by the Georgia Board of Bar Examiners.
Faenza suggested that applicants who cannot find an appropriate place to sit for the two-day online exam contact a Georgia law school, some of which may be able to find safe space to take the exam. She noted that the same health concerns that forced the in-person test to shift online may limit what spaces law schools have to offer.
Cathy Cox, the dean of Mercer Law School, said, "We plan to close our library for the two days of the online bar exam so our graduates could take the exam in the quiet space of the library, if they so choose. For many who have unreliable internet service or distractions at home, I think this would be a good option for them."
"We'll probably open it up to our graduates first," Cox added, "and if we still have space, we'd be happy for graduates of other law schools to take the exam here."
A growing number of jurisdictions during the past month have canceled their in-person July or September bar exams in favor of the National Conference of Bar Examiners' abbreviated online version in October. They include California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Vermont, Kentucky and Tennessee. Several more jurisdictions are giving examinees the option to take the online October test, including Texas, Arizona, and Oregon.
Faenza noted that anyone taking an in-person exam using NCBE questions before the Georgia exam may not also take the Georgia exam.
The September exam had been scheduleded for up to 1,250 applicants at the Georgia International Convention Center, where organizers had planned to require masks and keep applicants at least 6 feet apart.
Karen Sloan of Law.com contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250