Georgia State Court Judges' Leader Expects Uptick in Civil Litigation Pace
Judge Wes Tailor declined to predict when civil trials will restart but forecast that statewide filing deadlines reinstated July 14 will get cases moving faster.
July 22, 2020 at 06:07 PM
7 minute read
As the statewide court shutdown enters its fifth month, the Georgia Council of State Court Judges' president gave the Daily Report a status update on what to expect for civil litigation.
Filing deadlines reinstated statewide last week will likely quicken the pace of civil cases slowed by the suspension of trials, triggering judicial status conferences and an uptick in motion practice, said Judge Wes Tailor of Fulton County State Court, who became the council's president in May.
Plaintiffs and defense litigators alike have been frustrated over work slowdowns from the pandemic-prompted court shutdown. At Hall Booth Smith, which has a large defense litigation practice, co-founder John Hall told the Daily Report in early July that second-quarter productivity was down about 15% to 20%, and not being able to do "in-person depositions, interviews, hearings, meetings, settlement conferences or mediation has cost us significant revenue."
Civil litigants file far more cases in Georgia state courts than in superior ones. There were 74,082 new civil filings in state courts last year, compared with 55,112 for superior courts.
Disputes in state courts "are all about money," Tailor said, because these courts handle all civil disputes that don't require equity action from a judge, such as an injunction. That includes wrongful death, serious personal injury, medical and legal malpractice, product liability and breach of contract cases.
Somewhat surprisingly, Tailor said the number of new cases filed since March in Fulton State Court—the state's busiest—hasn't changed significantly, which he attributed to Fulton's electronic filing capabilities.
But what has changed, the judge said, is the case resolution rate, which has fallen in Fulton relative to a year ago—even with Zoom judicial hearings and mediations.
An impending trial date does help keep cases moving toward resolution, he acknowledged. "When folks have a deadline, it tends to focus their attention. Without a trial date pending, some cases might not resolve that otherwise might."
The pandemic has affected Georgia's 71 state courts differently, Tailor added. For one, e-filing technology varies widely by court, especially for those in rural counties with fewer resources. Some judges outside of metro Atlanta have reported a sharp drop-off in new filings, he said, and one South Georgia judge told him that "civil litigation has slowed to a crawl."
Filing Deadlines
Tailor declined to speculate on when civil jury trials will return to court calendars, but he does expect the reinstatement of filing deadlines to help hasten case resolution.
Georgia courts remain closed until at least Aug. 11, but, in a positive sign for firms concerned about billable hours, Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Harold Melton has reinstated deadlines for civil and criminal cases. The chief justice's order restarted the deadline clock for litigation tolled March 14 to resume ticking on July 14, except for jury trial proceedings.
That will likely get cases moving faster, Tailor said. "What litigants are probably going to see is more judges having status conferences in cases."
He, for one, will resume holding status hearings via Zoom in August. "That tends to get things moving," the judge said, especially for cases he hasn't heard from in a while. While status conferences are at the discretion of Georgia's 147 state court judges and senior judges, Tailor said other judges have told him they plan to do the same.
Like trials, status hearings focus parties' attention on the case, Tailor said, because they must update a judge on where things stand. That could be productive for litigators, he added. "When they must report to a client on either side—whether defense or plaintiffs—attorneys want to be able to tell them something is happening."
Tailor cautioned that some litigators don't seem aware that blanket tolling for civil cases ended last week. "One thing I'd like to impart to civil attorneys is that they need to really pay attention to the due dates on whatever filings they have coming up," the judge said. "Some have not been as attentive as they could. They need to read that emergency order."
Tailor offered litigators an additional message from his communications with his fellow state court judges during the pandemic. "We have been very pleased with the level of professionalism and courtesy lawyers have extended to each other," he said. "I hope that continues as we go forward in whatever the capacity."
Virtual Court
Tailor has a full schedule of hearings, motions and orders—all conducted via Zoom—since he's handling all aspects of his civil case docket except trials. But, like many trial lawyers, the judge said he is not as busy as he was before the court closures.
Ordinarily, he runs a five-week calendar, with a week each for nonjury civil and criminal hearings, followed by three trial weeks for civil and criminal cases. "I don't have those three trial weeks now," Tailor said, adding that he and his staff are instead scheduling non-jury matters every week.
Other metro Atlanta judges are also holding Zoom or WebX hearings for motions to dismiss or for summary judgment and the like, and some are holding bench trials.
But despite all the Zoom depositions and judicial hearings, many plaintiffs and defense lawyers have less work overall, because they're not preparing for trials. Even for defense litigators who don't handle a lot of trials, Tailor noted, it takes a lot of time, pretrial, either to attempt to resolve a case or work it up for a trial.
And as with e-filing capabilities, many state court judges outside of metro Atlanta aren't able to hold virtual court as easily, the judge said. Those in rural counties may not have the budget for video hearings, because Zoom is only free for a limited amount of time and participants.
"What people forget sometimes is that some counties don't have the same access to resources as we do here in Fulton or metro Atlanta," Tailor said.
Tailor forecast that the renewed filing deadlines will significantly increase motion practice. Response motions with their deadlines stayed now will need to be addressed, and that will increase when trial-related filing deadlines are restored.
Several types of civil litigation expected to surge, such as foreclosures, evictions and bankruptcies, are not under state courts' jurisdiction.
Trial Safety Logistics
It could be a while before the growing backlog of civil trials goes before a jury, since criminal trials take precedence.
"The biggest challenge we judges face is to balance the obligation to manage our dockets efficiently, while not exposing our staff, litigants and the public to unreasonable harm," Tailor said.
Safely restarting jury trials directly depends on how a courthouse is configured, the judge warned, not just social-distancing precautions in individual courtrooms.
"Trying to move people through security and into the courtrooms is a serious logistical issue," he said, and, again, it varies by courthouse. The Fulton County Courthouse, for instance, houses magistrate, probate, state and superior courts in a structure with just three entrances and a single elevator bank.
The number of people available for jury pools also may be limited because of safety concerns. Fulton State Court hasn't had any problem getting sufficient jurors in Tailor's decade on the bench, he said, but priority for juries will go to felony cases in superior court where someone is in jail awaiting trial and other cases where people's liberty is at stake.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250