Lawyers, Activists and Groups Call for Progressive Fulton District Attorney
We seek a district attorney who has the courage and compassion to balance the need to keep our community safe, while ensuring that all citizens are treated with dignity by the police and the criminal justice system.
July 27, 2020 at 05:50 PM
6 minute read
(Photo: Bigstock)
We are a collection of lawyers, activists, and grass roots organizations that embrace a vision for criminal justice in Fulton County that rejects past practices and policies that have over-criminalized Fulton County citizens and embraces a less punitive and more compassionate approach to criminal justice. We seek a district attorney who has the courage and compassion to balance the need to keep our community safe, while ensuring that all citizens are treated with dignity by the police and the criminal justice system.
The results of the June Democratic primary election for Fulton County district attorney revealed that a significant number of Fulton County residents favored progressive criminal justice policies over the status quo. There is a growing nationwide chorus of citizens demanding that prosecutors reexamine their role in fueling mass incarceration. Regardless of which of the two remaining candidates becomes the next Fulton County district attorney, we urge both candidates to publicly commit that, if elected, they will use their discretion to adopt and implement the following policies regarding juvenile prosecutions, drug possession, cash bail, and police accountability.
Our community is best served if the criminal justice system treats children as children, through delinquency proceedings in juvenile court, instead of criminal proceedings in superior court. Therefore, we seek a district attorney who will exercise their legal discretion by declining the prosecution of all children ages 13-17 in the superior court, absent exceptional circumstances, and who will petition for those cases to be conducted in juvenile court, allowing children to rehabilitated under the care of the Department of Juvenile Justice.
Under Georgia law, the superior court has exclusive original jurisdiction over the trial of any child 13 to 17 years of age who is alleged to have committed one of seven enumerated offenses. A child 13 to 17 convicted of any one of these crimes would be remanded to the Department of Corrections to serve their sentence with adults, instead of being adjudicated in juvenile court and placed under the care of the Department of Juvenile Justice. The current law transformed the treatment of juvenile offenders from a model that was based on rehabilitation and replaced it with a model based on punishment. However, at any time before indictment, the district attorney has the discretion, after investigation and for cause, to decline prosecution of a child 13 to 17 years of age in the superior court and may instead petition for adjudication of the child in juvenile court. We ask that the candidates commit to this being their policy absent truly exceptional circumstances.
Many citizens arrested and charged with drug possession are suffering from drug addictions and mental health issues that are best addressed as a public health problem rather than a criminal justice problem. Therefore, we seek a district attorney who is committed to resolving arrests relating to substance abuse and mental health disorders through dismissal, pre-indictment diversion programs, or other creative dispositions that do not require the person being charged and potentially having a record.
In Georgia, the possession of more than an ounce of marijuana is a felony punishable by 1-10 years. Possession of heroin, LSD, ecstasy, cocaine or amphetamines, in an amount that is less than one gram, is a felony punishable by 1-3 years, while possession of these same substances in an amount that is at least one gram, but less than four grams of a solid substance, is a felony punishable by 1-8 years. By definition, these offenses criminalize possession of small amounts of drugs that are commonly associated with individual use which should be treated as a public health issue. We ask that the candidates commit to never charging simple drug possession.
Cash bail often punishes and detains poor people, who simply don't have the resources to post bail, and disproportionately impacts poor and minority communities. We seek a district attorney who will commit to supporting and advocating for the reform and elimination of cash bail; who will establish and promulgate internal office policies regarding the presumption of release absent a showing of danger or flight risk; and who will train and ensure that line prosecutors follow procedures which value pretrial release, accounts for an accused's ability to pay, and which promotes alternatives to money bail.
We understand that judges, and not the district attorney, have the sole legal authority to set bond amounts for the pretrial release of a person accused of a crime and awaiting trial. In practice, however, the recommendations of the district attorney usually carry significant weight with most judges. The district attorney can play a critical role to help ensure that judges respect and follow bail laws so that citizens who are presumed innocent and are never being detained pretrial simply because they are too poor to pay bail. We ask that the candidates commit to never seeking money bonds as a means of effectuating pretrial detention.
Prosecutors play a critical role in ensuring that the police are held accountable for misconduct during an arrest, charging decisions, or in their sworn reports and testimony. Although we recognize that the district attorney must work closely with local and state law enforcement officials, we seek a district attorney who is committed to holding the police accountable when they do wrong, and who is committed to conducting independent, transparent, and professional investigations into excessive and unreasonable force allegations against the police.
Our state and nation are currently experiencing a racial divide and crisis, due in large part to the failure of the criminal justice system to prosecute police brutality. While it is important that prosecutors not be unduly swayed by community outrage against the police, it is just as important for prosecutors to apply the law equally to the police when they do wrong. When it comes to prosecuting the criminal laws, there should be no different, or de facto, legal standard for police officers than the standard that applies to everyday citizens.
Asian American Advocacy Fund
Black Trial Lawyers for Racial and Social Justice
Torris J. Butterfield—Associates
The Cochran Firm—Atlanta
Davis Bozeman Law Firm
Faith in Public Life
Gerald A. Griggs LLC
Jewish Community Relations Council of Atlanta
Legal Action Center
National Incarceration Association
Necessary Trouble Indivisible Group
Racial Justice Action Center
Restore Georgia
The Secret Firm P.C.
Spears & Filipovits LLC
Showing Up for Racial Justice—Atlanta
Women on the Rise GA
The Working Families Party
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/04/Transgender-healthcare-767x633-1.jpg)
Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
![Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising? Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/02/Georgia-State-Capitol-Building-Article-202102261106.jpg)
Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute read![A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/09/Brian-Kemp-03-767x633.jpg)
A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
- 2Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Einhorn Barbarito; Gibbons; Greenbaum Rowe; Pro Bono Partnership
- 4On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
- 5Is the Collateral Order Doctrine About to Have a 'Brat Summer'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250