Appeals Court Considers Reviving Age Bias Suit by Fired DeKalb Law Department Attorney
A lawyer fired by former DeKalb County Attorney O.V. Brantley is fighting the age-discrimination suit a federal judge tossed last year,
July 28, 2020 at 05:16 PM
5 minute read
An Atlanta appeals panel heard arguments by a former staff attorney at the DeKalb County Law Department who wants to revive an age discrimination lawsuit claiming he was ousted by a new county attorney who wanted to hire more "baby lawyers."
Former Senior Assistant County Attorney Mark Thompson also claims his firing violated Georgia's Whistleblower Act because he was fired after he began digging into allegations that a county contractor was taking kickbacks. That case ultimately led to a grand jury leveling multiple findings against county officials and contractors involving millions of dollars.
But the issue before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Tuesday centered on Thompson's assertion that then-County Attorney Overtis "O.V." Brantley fired him as part of a campaign to hire younger lawyers.
Thompson's lawyer, Legare, Attwood & Wolfe partner Eleanor Attwood, said the evidence showed that, when Brantley came aboard in 2013, she began targeting older employees like Thompson—then a 54-year-old man with more than 11 years on the job.
Representing DeKalb County, Taylor English Duma partner Randy Gepp said Thompson was fired not because of his age but because he was argumentative and insubordinate and resisted demands that he work with other lawyers handling the kickback investigation.
Thompson's request to be relieved from handling that case, and a heated meeting with Brantley was "the last straw," said Gepp, who represents the county with firm partners Marc Taylor and Shawntel Hebert.
Both Attwood and Gepp declined to discuss the case.
Thompson, now in private practice in Atlanta, began working for the county Law Department in 2003 and rose to the position of senior county attorney. In 2010, he was assigned to represent the county in a breach-of-contract suit filed by county contractor Paul Champion of Champion Tree Service, the case that would ultimately expose the bid-rigging and kickback allegations.
Former Fulton County Attorney Brantley was appointed to lead DeKalb's law department in 2013. Court filings say she made no secret of her desire to fill vacancies in the department with younger lawyers.
"When she became county attorney, Brantley learned that all of the county attorneys were senior assistant county attorneys or above, and there were no entry-level or lesser-experienced attorneys in the Law Department," said the county's appellate brief.
"Each SACA had their own caseload and they did not work in teams. Brantley wanted to establish a team approach with more than one attorney on most files and a supervisory system where more experienced attorneys could utilize lesser-experienced attorneys," it said.
After her appointment, Brantley met with Thompson to discuss the Champion case.
"Brantley observed that Thompson had difficulty explaining the case coherently or succinctly, but was passionate and emotional about it," the county's appellate brief said.
Concerned about its complexity, Thompson recommended hiring outside counsel to assist. Following an adverse ruling in the case, Thompson asked to withdraw from the litigation.
"During a contentious meeting to discuss Thompson's withdrawal, Brantley told him that he did not work well with others, was not a team player, and acted like a child," said the county's brief.
"She deemed his insistence on withdrawing to be insubordination, and considered terminating his employment," it said.
In 2015, Thompson was allowed to withdraw from the case and offered a choice: Resign or be fired. He quit.
In 2017, Thompson sued the county and Brantley for age and race discrimination and for violation of Georgia's Whistleblower Act in DeKalb County Superior Court. The county had it removed to Georgia's Northern District Court.
Judge Mark Cohen dismissed the race and age discrimination claims on summary judgment in March 2019, but said the state whistleblower claims could proceed in state court.
Thompson appealed the age discrimination ruling, and the state court claims remain pending in DeKalb Superior Court.
In arguing before an appellate panel including Chief Judge William Pryor Jr. and Judges Robin Rosenbaum and Robert Luck, Attwood argued that Cohen's decision brushed aside Brantley's demonstrated hostility toward older attorneys in general and Thompson in particular.
In categorizing Brantley's comments on older lawyers as "stray comments," said Attwood, the trial judge ignored evidence that a jury could infer as proof of age-based animus, notwithstanding the county attorney's assertions that Thompson was an obstreperous employee.
"Given the backdrop of all this other evidence, this evidence of hiring trends and discriminatory remarks … a jury could listen to all that evidence and say, 'You know what? Ms. Brantley was making all that up,'" Attwood said.
Gepp did not dispute that Brantley had expressed a desire to hire "baby lawyers" by recruiting younger legal talent. But there were other lawyers older than Thompson in the Law Department who were not fired or forced out, while Thompson's own disrespectful demeanor offered "ample reason for any employer" to fire him, Gepp said.
Thompson's wish to withdraw from the Champion case "is what started the ball rolling," he said, but his "contentious meeting" with Brantley was the "last straw."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
- 2Buyer Beware: Continuity of Coverage in Legal Malpractice Insurance
- 3‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Some Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4BCLP Joins Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices
- 5White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250