Letter: Advocacy for Action Reacts to Judicial Appointment
"If ... talent, experience, temperament, merit, competence and abilities are necessary qualities for a judge, maybe someone can explain why Governor Kemp appointed a politician with little or no trial experience over a diverse candidate with extensive judicial experience to the Fulton County Superior Court? We cannot," the writers said.
July 21, 2021 at 01:32 PM
9 minute read
On several occasions, Governor Kemp has negatively commented about crime in Atlanta: On June 19, 2021, he tweeted: "According to the [M]ayor, rising crime in our capital city is everyone's fault but hers. Getting Georgians back to work, back to school, and back to normal didn't lead to more crime. The left's anti-police, soft-on-crime agenda is to blame." On June 21, 2021, Governor Kemp stated to the press that the Mayor of Atlanta was "passing the buck" and blaming COVID as to why crime had escalated in Atlanta in recent months. And, on July 19 2021, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) reported that Governor Kemp plans to call a special legislative session to convene and focus on tackling crime in Atlanta.
Yet, on July 20, 2021, just two days after the AJC article, Governor Kemp appointed Chuck Eaton, a Public Service Commissioner and a White Male who has apparently never practiced law as a litigator, to the Fulton County Superior Court which is one of the busiest trial courts and a court that has one of the heaviest criminal caseloads in the State of Georgia. According to the Administrative Office of the Courts, excluding domestic cases, almost half of all new court case filings in Fulton Superior Court are criminal cases involving felony charges as either a new case or revocation of a sentence on a previously adjudicated case. According to the Fulton County Manager Dick Anderson, Fulton County Superior Court has a backlog of at least 34,000 cases and more than 1,000 individuals are sitting in the Fulton County jail unindicted. It will take running two (2) grand juries simultaneously, twenty (20) additional courtrooms as well as possible night and weekend court over an almost three (3) year period to reduce the case backlog. (June 30, 2021 Fulton County Board of Commissioners Meeting). How then can the Governor justify appointing an untutored neophyte to that Court under those circumstances over another lawyer, with extensive criminal and judicial experience of over twenty years. How can that be explained?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApply Now: Superior Court Judge Sought for Mountain Judicial Circuit Bench
3 minute read‘Undermines the Rule of Law’: Retired US Judges Condemn Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons
Trial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
A Judge Ordered Squabbling Lawyers to Have Lunch: Here's What Happened
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Charlie Javice Jury Will Not See Her Texts About Elizabeth Holmes
- 2Unit Owners Sued Board For Failure To Maintain Adequate Fire Insurance: This Week In Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 3NY Judge Resigns After Avoiding Jury Duty by Telling Court He Couldn't Be Impartial
- 4'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
- 5Longtime Purdue GC Accused of Drunken Driving Hires Big-Name Defense Attorney
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250