Supreme Court of Georgia virtual oral arguments in Floyd v. Stone. (Courtesy photo)
An attorney’s attempt to unseat a gubernatorially appointed judge on the basis the governor allegedly took too long to make the appointment made its way before the Supreme Court of Georgia Thursday.
But after about 40 minutes of oral arguments, the remote proceeding concluded with the justices expressing concern over “mandamus” and “term-limit” arguments, raised by both sides over the governor’s contested appointment delay.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
