Tex McIver (seated) is surrounded by attorneys as they review questions from the jury during his murder trial at the Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta on April 12, 2018. (Photo: Bob Andres/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP, Pool) Georgia Supreme Court Overturns McIver's Murder Conviction, Citing Trial Court Error
"I am just incredibly happy for Tex," said one of his lawyers, Don Samuel. "He never should have been convicted. The jury was never given the option to find he was negligent."
June 30, 2022 at 05:08 PM
5 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court has reversed Claud Lee "Tex" McIver III's murder conviction for the 2016 shooting death of his wife, Diane, ruling the trial court was mistaken in denying his request to charge the jury on a lesser involuntary manslaughter offense.
In its opinion released Thursday, the court reversed a Fulton County Superior Court jury's convictions for felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony but upheld its conviction for influencing a witness. During his 2018 murder trial, McIver's lawyers argued that he accidentally shot his wife while riding in the car with her.
Judge Robert McBurney, Fulton County Superior Court. (Photo: John Disney/ALM) This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements
Venezuelan Man Convicted in Laken Riley's Killing Asks for a New Trial
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 2How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 3How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 4Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
- 5Should a Financially Dependent Child Who Rejects One Parent Still Be Emancipated?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
