With Demand High, Georgia Legal Food Frenzy Seeks More Donors
"The demand in our area of the state is at pandemic levels because of the end of COVID-era programs," said Danah Craft, executive director of Feeding Georgia (formerly the Georgia Food Bank Association). "And with inflation, food and fuel prices are up. And school is about to end [for the summer, and] 60% of kids in public schools in Georgia are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch."
April 13, 2023 at 01:26 PM
4 minute read
A year after raising $880,248.08, the Georgia Legal Food Frenzy, the law industry's 12th annual statewide food drive set for April 17-28, is back. And this year, Georgians' need for food donations may be at an all-time high. "The demand in our area of the state is at pandemic levels because of the end of COVID-era programs," said Danah Craft, executive director of Feeding Georgia (formerly the Georgia Food Bank Association). "And with inflation, food and fuel prices are up. And school is about to end [for the summer, and] 60% of kids in public schools in Georgia are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. So the last day of school is not a happy day for a lot of those families. So this comes at the perfect time to help the food banks have the resources that they need for what they know is coming this summer." Craft spoke in an interview at the Frenzy's kickoff event Wednesday night at King & Spalding's office in Atlanta. The event raises funds for the state's nine food banks and is co-sponsored by Feeding Georgia, Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr's office and the State Bar of Georgia's Young Lawyers Division. In 2022, the Frenzy's fundraising total was $57,000 short of the previous year's record of $936,883. Like last year, the 2023 event's goal is to raise $1 million, which is equal to 4 million meals. "Over the past decade we have raised over $3.2 million to fight food insecurity. … That equals about 13 million meals," Carr said during a series of speeches by Frenzy co-sponsors and event hosts. "We've always had a good response." Like last year, he is issuing a billable-hour challenge, asking every lawyer in the state to donate the equivalent of one billable hour to help the Frenzy reach its $1 million goal. Carr implored the event's attendees to contact as many attorneys they know or work with to donate. "Think about what would happen in this state if every single lawyer would give one billable hour to their food banks. That's transformative," Carr said, later adding that 1 in 8 Georgians is food insecure. A total of 189 law firms were involved in the 2022 Frenzy. This year, like in previous ones, teams and individuals can register for the event not only beforehand but also up until the final day by visiting galegalfoodfrenzy.org. "We couldn't be more excited," Craft said. "Early registrations have been really strong. We had a great year last year. We know we can build on that momentum this year, especially with the attorney general's one-billable-hour challenge. I think it's absolutely critical that communities come together at this time to help the food banks and feed hungry neighbors." Leaders with the Young Lawyers Division's Frenzy committee are also thrilled it's returning. "It's very exciting. … It's just a really great time to get the legal community together to rally for a cause. I can't think of a better cause than this one," Caroline Scalf, the committee's co-chair, said in an interview. Morgan Lyndall, a committee director, added, "Every year we are growing a following with a group of firms that continue to make this a part of their culture. … So obviously it's exciting for those firms who compete annually. Additionally, it's exciting for our legal community to be able to impact hunger as we go into a season where the [dependence] on the food banks increases." Also at Wednesday's kickoff, the winner of the Law School Food Frenzy, which took place 13-24, was announced. The University of Georgia School of Law, which raised more than $23,000, took home the trophy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Supreme Court of Georgia Accepts Lawyer's Voluntary Surrender of License
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 2De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 3Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 4Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 5Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250