What You Need to Know
- Several Georgia judges have presided over multiple jury trials resulting in $10 million or larger verdicts in the past five years.
- Gwinnett, DeKalb and Fulton county courts produced 41% of the state's top verdicts between Jan. 1, 2018, and April 10.
- Wrongful death, motor vehicle tort, medical malpratice and workplace negligence claims account for 78% of Georgia's eight-figure or higher verdicts since January 2018.
These Judges Presided Over Multiple Jury Trials Resulting in $10 Million or More Verdicts
Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone
Gwinnett County leads the state with six jury verdicts returned at or in excess of $10 million in the past five years, per Law.com's Verdict Search. With two of the verdicts returned by Gwinnett County Superior Court juries, 66% of the multimillion-dollar outcomes occurred in Gwinnett County State Court. Of those four jury awards at or exceeding eight-figures, Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone presided over 75% of the trials. Iannazzone made headlines in August after jurors returned a $1.7 billion punitive award against Ford Motor Co. in the product liability case of Hill v. Ford. Ford announced its plans to appeal the verdict the following month. Prior to the pandemic, Iannazzone presided over two trials producing high-value verdicts. In May 2019, the Gwinnett County State Court judge oversaw Johnson v. Francis et al., a medical-malpractice matter that resulted in a $14 million jury verdict. The case later settled in August 2020 for a confidential amount following an award of additional legal fees. Meanwhile in November 2018, Iannazzone held a wrongful-death trial in Herrera v. Extended Stay America et al in which the jury awarded $46 million. Defendants satisfied the judgment as of Feb. 18, 2019, per Iannazzone's docket.
'Heard Round the World:' Ford Hit With $1.7B Punitive Damages Verdict in Ga. Trial
Judge Steve C. Jones
Seated upon the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia bench, Judge Steve C. Jones presided over two 2022 trials that produced nine-figure jury verdicts. Jones kicked off the year signing off on a $127 million jury verdict awarded in the wrongful death and product liability case of Andrews et al v. Autoliv Japan, Ltd. in January 2022. The matter is currently on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Eight months later, Jones presided over Edwards v. Grubbs et al, an excessive force complaint against the city of Atlanta and one of its former police officers. The jury returned a $100 million verdict in the matter, but Jones reduced the award by $60 million the following month upon granting a renewed Rule 50 (b) Motion by the city of Atlanta to set aside the nine-figure jury verdict and enter judgment as a matter of law.
$60M Award Set Aside After City of Atlanta Clinches Rule 50 Motion for Judgment
Andrew Prather II
Like Jones, Prather presided over a pair of jury trials that resulted in two verdicts in excess of $10 million within the same year. In July 2019, the Muscogee County State Court chief judge held a trial in the wrongful-death case of Thornton v. Ralston GA LLC, et al that resulted in a $125 million verdict. The case later settled for a confidential amount. At more than double the initial jury award, Prather's courtroom garnered more spotlight a month later when jurors returned a $280 million verdict in Madere v. Greenwich Insurance Co., another wrongful death matter. But the verdict didn't remain intact as awarded. In accordance with Georgia law, Prather reduced $100 million awarded in punitive damages to $250,000, slashing the overall verdict to $180.3 million.
Jurors' Award Motivations
[caption id="attachment_113724" align="alignleft" width="200"] Cameron D. Hawkins, of the Law Office of Cameron Hawkins LLC in Atlanta. (Courtesy photo)[/caption] What motivates Georgia jurors to continue awarding multimillion-dollar verdicts varies depending on who's asked. Atlanta litigator Cameron D. Hawkins said Fulton County Superior Court jurors awarded more damages against a corporate defendant in a personal injury case to offset attorney's fees. "That was an interesting aspect that I've been hearing through other people who have tried cases. Now I've experienced that," Hawkins said. "[The jury] upped the award, so it wasn't just based on what they thought it was worth, or what they thought would compensate the plaintiff. They also added a little extra in there because they know attorneys are going to take a fee." But other attorneys, like Michael L. Bell of Lightfoot, Franklin & White in Birmingham, Alabama, attribute the eight-figure or larger outcomes to a societal desensitization to the value of money, coupled with enhanced emotional reactions to current social conditions. "There's no doubt that our modern juries are unhappy," Bell told the Daily Report in January. "There's a fair amount of distrust."
'Modern Juries Are Unhappy': 6 Ways to Win Them Over
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readFew Atlanta-Centric Law Firms Expected to Pay Associate Bonuses at Market Scale
5 minute readExperts Not Foreseeing More Rules Governing Prosecutors' Actions After Georgia Court's Removal of DA From Election Case
8 minute readNew Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250