At the request of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the Supreme Court of Georgia has issued a ruling clarifying state law surrounding fiduciary rights—but not without perturbing some justices in the process.

As an attorney involved in the underlying dispute weighed in on the ruling and its implications for lawyers who advise fiduciaries in Georgia, at least one justice aired her opposition to the federal inquiry in a partial dissent.

Fiduciary Breach?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]