A litigator recently recognized for being a distinguished leader is gaining national attention after a judge vacated his client’s $1.5 million verdict and granted a new trial in connection to social media posts made by the plaintiff attorney.
As word of the jurist’s discretionary ruling spreads, attorneys across the nation are weighing in on the implications of the Georgia order. From ethics experts to constitutional attorneys, legal professionals are divided over the developing dispute.
‘Broad Discretion’
![Michael Rafi,left, and Alex Brown,right, of Rafi Law Firm. Courtesy photos](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/06/Brown-Rafi-767x633-3-300x248.jpg)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]