Jeff Davis, former State Bar of Georgia executive director, (left) is running for Georgia Court of Appeals against Judge Tabitha Ponder, Cobb County Magistrate Court in the nonpartisan primary election on May 21, 2024, (Courtesy photos) 'Not Ripe': Challenge of Georgia Court of Appeals Candidate's Residency Nixed
"Most tellingly, he did not have a key to the apartment, a mailbox key, or a device to access the building. To get into the apartment, he had to make arrangements with one of his sons," the judge wrote.
May 06, 2024 at 06:10 PM
5 minute read
Election and Political Law
What You Need to Know
- Residency challenge launched against Georgia Court of Appeals candidate nixed two weeks before May 21 nonpartisan primary election.
- Administrative law judge rules residency challenge brought against Jeff Davis is 'not ripe.'
- Initial decision outlines that Davis must meet 'residency qualification as of the date of his election,' rather than candidate qualification..
The judicial race to replace retiring Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller on the Georgia Court of Appeals will remain contested after an administrative law judge ruled Monday that a qualifications challenge launched against candidate Jeff Davis had not yet become "ripe."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View All
Combative Giuliani Appears in NYC Court After Missing Deadline to Surrender Assets in Ga. Election Worker Defamation Case
4 minute read
Georgia RICO Case Against Trump Likely to Avoid Trial Amid Election Win, Nationally-Known Law Professor Says
Fulton Reelects Willis as DA Amid Ongoing 2020 Election Case Against Trump
3 minute read
Big Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In Mafia Case, Justices Ponder: Is Murder Always Violent?
- 2In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
- 3Lowenstein Hires Ex-FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller to Lead its Commodities, Derivatives Practice
- 42025 Will Be a Turning Point for Crypto Counselor Laura Brookover
- 5Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Practices Stand to Gain from Trump Election
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
