New survey data illustrates that law firm leaders are already moving down this road by leveraging Gen AI for improved legal drafting support. Integrating Generative AI into a Lawyer's Workflow
Legal AI — Gen AI tools trained for the legal profession — is transforming the practice of law right now, enabling lawyers at firms who are adopting these tools to draft legal documents faster than ever
July 01, 2024 at 09:15 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Legal AI — Gen AI tools trained for the legal profession — is transforming the practice of law right now, enabling lawyers at firms who are adopting these tools to draft legal documents faster than ever, according to panelists at one of the featured sessions during a recent Wall Street Journal event for law firm managing partners that was sponsored by LexisNexis.
"Generative AI creates efficiencies, it allows for automation, it essentially allows us to do what we as lawyers want to do more than anything else, which is really excel at the expert judgment layer and application of how we work," said Ilona Logvinova, managing counsel and head of innovation for McKinsey Legal. "The question is, where can you inject automation into your workflow as lawyers?"
New survey data illustrates that law firm leaders are already moving down this road by leveraging Gen AI for improved legal drafting support.
The LexisNexis 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations, surveyed managing partners and other senior leaders at large law firms, as well as executives in corporate legal departments at Fortune 1000 companies, to better understand the business impact of Gen AI technology on the legal industry. Our survey found that 39% of law firm leaders named "drafting documents" as one of the ways their firms plan to use AI technology, the third most popular use case cited.
The panelists at the Wall Street Journal event noted that Legal AI delivers tremendous new efficiencies in legal drafting but does not substitute technology in the place of humans. Rather, it serves as a drafting assistant and merely modifies the lawyer's role from being a "drafter" to being an "editor" of form-driven legal documents by providing them with a much better starting point.
For example, a Legal AI tool can instantly produce rough drafts of legal memos, cease and desist letters, contract clauses and client communications — all from a simple initial user prompt — that are grounded in authoritative legal content. In essence, the Gen AI technology helps to reduce the manual work involved in creating these documents and then allows the lawyer to apply their reasoning and legal judgment to refine the final product.
"Clients hire an attorney for the attorney's knowledge, experience, and ability to interpret and apply legal precedent," said Joel Murray, an attorney with McKean Smith in Portland, Oregon. "If properly developed, AI can be another means by which attorneys can increase their productivity and obtain optimal results for clients."
A growing number of law firms are making investments now in Gen AI tools built specifically for the legal profession. Our 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations found that 53% of Am Law 200 firms have already purchased Legal AI tools and that 45% of Am Law 200 firms are using Gen AI now for legal matters.
This article was based on one of the panel discussions at the Wall Street Journal event, "What Every Managing Partner & C-Suite Leader Needs to Know About Legal AI," which took place on January 31st in New York City. Watch the entire session, Navigating Opportunities: Finding Benefits in AI Growth, for more insights from industry leaders.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute read
Lawyers Share Concerns, Predictions Over How Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
6 minute read
A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
