Some experts think the ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations will be even more consequential than the end of Chevron deference, which curtails all federal regulatory agencies' powers.
July 05, 2024 at 03:47 PM
5 minute read
Some experts believe a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations could produce more demand for litigators than one curtailing all federal regulatory agencies’ powers.
The Supreme Court said June 28 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo that it was overturning a legal precedent set in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984 that federal judges should defer to regulatory agencies in cases when a law is ambiguous.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Skolnick Legal Group, P.C., a construction and commercial litigation firm with offices in New Jersey and New York is seeking a Litigation As...
Cullen and Dykman is seeking an associate attorney with a minimum of 5+ years in insurance coverage experience as well as risk transfer and ...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a midlevel insurance coverage associate for its Newark, NJ and/or Philadelphia, PA offices. ...
