U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on March 6, 2024. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Two SCOTUS Decisions to Amplify Demand for Litigation Aimed at Fed. Agencies
Some experts think the ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations will be even more consequential than the end of Chevron deference, which curtails all federal regulatory agencies' powers.
July 05, 2024 at 03:47 PM
5 minute read
What You Need to Know
- A Supreme Court ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations could produce more litigation than one curtailing federal regulatory agencies' power.
- Some experts said there will be increased demand for new litigation, as well for action on pending cases, 'that take new approaches to the strategy that they're adopting.'
- The ruling could make sense for companies seeking to expand to a new market or add new services, one attorney said.
Some experts believe a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations could produce more demand for litigators than one curtailing all federal regulatory agencies' powers.
The Supreme Court said June 28 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo that it was overturning a legal precedent set in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984 that federal judges should defer to regulatory agencies in cases when a law is ambiguous.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read
Law Firm Sued for Telemarketing Calls to Customers on Do Not Call Registry
From Courtrooms to Conversations: The Unexpected Joys of Podcasting as a Lawyer
Clients, Not Counsel, Have Most To Gain from Georgia Tax Court, Lawyer Predicts
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 2Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 3Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 4How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 5Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
