Meet the Members: New Legal Committee to Address 'Civil Justice Gap'
"This committee will use data-driven methodologies to be innovative in exploring and discerning what regulatory reforms could address the issues preventing Georgians from receiving critical civil legal services without diminishing consumer protections," said committee chair Justice Carla Wong McMillian in a statement Thursday.
October 31, 2024 at 01:06 PM
4 minute read
Court AdministrationWhat You Need to Know
- Supreme Court of Georgia launches committee to address civil justice gap common in rural communities.
- The Supreme Court Study Committee on Legal Regulatory Reform is made up of 13 members, including judges and lawyers.
- Committee is tasked with developing recommendations that improve access to civil legal services for rural or low-income Georgians by June 2025.
Having limited access to justice is a scary reality for some Georgians situated in legal deserts characterized by the presence of few, if any, licensed attorneys. In time for Halloween, the Supreme Court of Georgia has announced a new committee aimed at addressing what some consider a frightful gap in civil justice—fueled by a rural lawyer drought—with the launch of the Supreme Court Study Committee on Legal Regulatory Reform. "This committee will use data-driven methodologies to be innovative in exploring and discerning what regulatory reforms could address the issues preventing Georgians from receiving critical civil legal services without diminishing consumer protections," said committee chair Justice Carla Wong McMillian in a statement Thursday. |
'Come Up With Meaningful Solutions'
According to the court statement issued Thursday, Supreme Court of Georgia Chief Justice Michael P. Boggs ordered the creation of the 13-member committee to address the state's civil justice gap that often prevents many rural or low-income Georgia residents from acquiring legal representation in noncriminal matters.
|
Legal Deserts: Lawyers Are Fleeing Some Parts of This State Leaving 1M People Unrepresented
Alongside McMillian, Georgia Court of Appeals Presiding Judge Stephen Louis A. Dillard will vice-chair the committee, tasked with developing recommendations to improve "access to civil legal services for rural or low-income Georgians by giving them more options while also maintaining high standards for legal practitioners" by June 2025. The remaining 11 committee members include judges from various classes of state courts and attorneys from a number of practice areas, and input will be sought from additional state court judges, lawyers, community partners and the public, according to the court announcement. As a central Georgia native of Macon, Dillard said he understood "how crucial it is to carefully examine this important issue." "I look forward to working closely with Justice McMillian and many other stakeholders to come up with meaningful solutions that will make justice more accessible and improve the lives of our fellow Georgians," Dillard said.
|
Slideshow: Meet the Supreme Court Study Committee on Legal Regulatory Reform Members
Noting that the high court "is vested by the Georgia Constitution with the responsibility to regulate the practice of law to ensure that the public is protected and that the people of Georgia receive competent legal counsel," McMillian expounded on the potential for the committee to cultivate solutions to address the state's civil justice gap. "[T]here may be narrow areas where people who are not lawyers can be trained to serve clients who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford lawyers or who live in areas without lawyers," McMillian said. "There also may be ways to encourage new or existing lawyers to provide their services to indigent residents or in legal deserts."
|
Do It Yourself: For Many in Georgia, Legal Help Just Isn't Available
|
'Explore Innovative Opportunities'
With the stop clock now running on the committee's eight-month deadline, additional legal organizations are now committing their support. In addition to the National Center for State Courts offering technical assistance, the State Bar of Georgia has pledged its support. "We share the Supreme Court of Georgia's desire to explore innovative opportunities to serve the citizens of Georgia while balancing the mission of the legal profession: to protect the public and improve the quality of legal services," Cadle said. "We appreciate the opportunity to partner with the Court in evaluating opportunities and look forward to engaging the members of the State Bar in that effort."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllState, Federal Courts in North Carolina Announce Reopening Dates Following Hurricane Helene
Tune in Tuesday: Georgia Supreme Court Bears Down on Final Oral Arguments of 2024
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250