![](https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline//contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/09/Jerrika-Anderson-767x633.jpg)
Facing the Civil Fraud Penalty? Here’s What You Need to Know
According to the IRS Criminal Investigations 2023 Annual Report, fraudulent schemes cost the government about $5.5 billion.
January 07, 2025 at 12:21 PM
6 minute read
If you are under investigation for tax fraud by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), you are likely feeling a mix of anxiety and uncertainty. The civil fraud penalty is one of the most severe consequences a taxpayer can face. However, the good news is that understanding the process and knowing your rights can go a long way in protecting you from costly mistakes and ensuring that you handle the situation properly. Here is a comprehensive breakdown of the civil fraud penalty, what it means for you and how to protect yourself.
What Is the Civil Fraud Penalty?
The civil fraud penalty is imposed when the IRS determines that you intentionally falsified your tax return in order to evade paying taxes. According to Section 6663 of the Internal Revenue Code, the penalty amounts to a staggering 75% of the taxes owed. To make matters worse, even if the IRS proves that only a portion of the underpayment is attributable to fraud, the 75% penalty applies to the entire underpayment, except to the extent the taxpayer can show by a preponderance of the evidence the portions of the underpayment that were not fraudulent. Thus, for example, a $100,000 underpayment attributed to fraud becomes a $175,000 liability, plus interest on the full tax and penalty deficiency.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Clients, Not Counsel, Have Most To Gain from Georgia Tax Court, Lawyer Predicts Clients, Not Counsel, Have Most To Gain from Georgia Tax Court, Lawyer Predicts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/10/Gavel-And-Money-767x633.jpg)
Clients, Not Counsel, Have Most To Gain from Georgia Tax Court, Lawyer Predicts
6 minute read![Georgia Removed From Lawsuit Challenging Student Loan Forgiveness; Case Transferred to Missouri Georgia Removed From Lawsuit Challenging Student Loan Forgiveness; Case Transferred to Missouri](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/10/Student-Loans-767x633.jpg)
Georgia Removed From Lawsuit Challenging Student Loan Forgiveness; Case Transferred to Missouri
![Reality TV Star Julie Chrisley Resentenced to 7 Years in Bank Fraud, Tax-Evasion case Reality TV Star Julie Chrisley Resentenced to 7 Years in Bank Fraud, Tax-Evasion case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/09/Eleanor-L-Ross-1-767x633.jpg)
Reality TV Star Julie Chrisley Resentenced to 7 Years in Bank Fraud, Tax-Evasion case
5 minute read![Off-Limits? Judicial Authority Takes Center Stage in Dispute Over Municipal Utility Rates Off-Limits? Judicial Authority Takes Center Stage in Dispute Over Municipal Utility Rates](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/09/Will-767x633.jpg)
Off-Limits? Judicial Authority Takes Center Stage in Dispute Over Municipal Utility Rates
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months
- 2Eagles or Chiefs? At These Law Firms, Super Bowl Sunday Gets Complicated
- 3Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty
- 4Wilmer, White & Case, Crowell Among the Latest to Add DC Lateral Partners
- 5Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250