A win for one plaintiff’s lawyer at an appellate court is typically considered a win for the entire plaintiffs’ bar-but a case decided last week by the Georgia Supreme Court is an exception.
The ruling in certain respects disappointed other plaintiffs’ lawyers who had been closely watching the case because they had hoped the court would decide that the state legislature didn’t really abolish joint and several liability and expand the applicability of apportionment when it overhauled tort law in 2005.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
