Manatt, Phelps & Phillips has agreed to pay $25 million to settle claims that a false advertising and trademark dilution case it filed against billionaires Stewart and Lynda Resnick amounted to malicious prosecution.

The Resnicks, founders of Los Angeles-based Roll International Corp., brought the case against Manatt after the firm sued them on behalf of the executors of the estate of Diana, Princess of Wales, and the trustees of The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund. The Diana fund had claimed that one of Roll’s divisions, the Franklin Mint, was illegally selling memorabilia bearing the likeness of Diana, who died in 1997, in violation of the Lanham Act.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]