Justices of the Supreme Court of Georgia on Monday were clear who they wanted to hear from during oral argument over who should bear the burden of a $106,000 mortgage fraud loss.
For 20 minutes, they fired question after question to a lawyer for a title insurance company arguing that his client should not be forced to pay the claim of a lender tricked by a phantom borrower.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
