Election lawyers in Georgia say that despite warnings that last week’s landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court will give corporations significantly more power in elections, including judicial contests, the case will have little impact here.
In his dissent to the decision, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority decision “unleashes the floodgates of corporate and union general treasury spending” in judicial elections.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
