In your Daily Report issue for Oct. 21, a simple issue was raised “AG, election board fight could revisit Perdue v. Baker”: Why would the titular head of the Democratic Party of Georgia and Democratic Attorney General Thurbert E. Baker refuse to hold the Democratic Party of Georgia accountable for its continued frivolous litigation challenges to Georgia’s photo ID law after the U.S. Supreme Court, and others, have repeatedly upheld photo ID as constitutional Baker’s response was kindergarten political name-calling-”political muckraking” and “legal over-reaching”-through hired staff paid for by Georgia taxpayers.
When I was asked about Baker’s comments, as well as the complete absence of any meaningful explanation for his inaction on behalf of his clients the governor, the State Election Board and Georgia taxpayers, my answer was simple: It is who he is.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
