The growing use of electronic devices by the public to record events and broadcast them over the internet has prompted Georgia’s superior court judges to dramatically rewrite the state’s longtime rule governing the presence of cameras in court.
But the proposed rewrite of what for more than 30 years has been known simply as “Rule 22″ is raising questions about whether this will hamper access to—and coverage of—the courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
