The legal profession’s system of self-governance relies in part on what is effectively an “honor code” for attorneys. Specifically, when an attorney becomes aware of misconduct by another attorney, many states require that the attorney report the violation to the applicable bar authority and even discipline attorneys for their failure to report. Notably, however, Georgia applies a permissive standard, whereby attorneys are encouraged to report but are not required to do so.
Regardless of whether reporting is mandatory or permissive, an attorney that learns that another attorney destroyed evidence or misappropriated client funds, for example, may feel obligated to alert the bar. However, the question of whether reporting is appropriate (or required) involves a number of considerations depending on the circumstances and the jurisdiction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
